2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of body position on the material properties of soft tissue in the human thigh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Loading reduced soft tissue thicknesses of the buttocks, particularly MT thickness. The MRI loader showed the same trends in force deflection responses as reported in prior work by the authors [21]. Lastly, the reduction in tissue thickness with loading was influenced by the total unloaded tissue thickness, but not influenced by fatty infiltration of the gluteus maximus muscle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Loading reduced soft tissue thicknesses of the buttocks, particularly MT thickness. The MRI loader showed the same trends in force deflection responses as reported in prior work by the authors [21]. Lastly, the reduction in tissue thickness with loading was influenced by the total unloaded tissue thickness, but not influenced by fatty infiltration of the gluteus maximus muscle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Stretch was calculated as (loaded tissue thickness)/(unloaded tissue thickness) from the MRI data. The stress and stretch data were modeled using an incompressible first-order Ogden material and compared to previously published data measured in the proximal femur soft tissue during progressive loading [21]. The relationship between the stress and stretch in the first-order Ogden model is described in Eq.…”
Section: Soft Tissue Changes With Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, we performed our experiment only on young Japanese males, but changes in the participant demographics could affect the mechanical behavior of soft tissues (Derby & Akhtar, 2015). Eventually, we conducted our experiment only when the upper arm was fully extended on the experimental table (Figure 3b); however, different upper arm positions may change the soft tissue stiffness (Scott et al, 2020). To further validate our findings, future studies will examine soft tissue stiffness in different locations of the body, a broader demographic range from young adults to seniors, and various body positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason could be that the material properties of soft tissues might not be appropriate. According to Scott et al (2020) , the apparent soft tissue material properties could be significantly different even for the same subject from different positions. The soft tissue of the adult HBM was simulated with an isotropic homogeneous Neohookean material not accounting for regional difference of properties, the presence of muscles, their fascia, or the possible sliding between structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%