2016
DOI: 10.5056/jnm15095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Bolus Volume and Texture on Pharyngeal Pressure Events Using High-resolution Manometry and Its Comparison with Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study

Abstract: Background/AimsThe purpose of this study was to develop new parameters of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and to applicate these to quantify the effect of bolus volume and texture on pharyngeal swallowing. MethodsTen healthy subjects prospectively swallowed dry, thin fluid 2 mL, thin fluid 5 mL, thin fluid 10 mL, and drinking twice to compare effects of bolus volume. To compare effect of texture, subjects swallowed thin fluid 5 mL, yogurt 5 mL, and bread twice. A 32-sensor HRM catheter and BioVIEW ANALYSIS sof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The faster pharyngeal bolus transit might be associated with the increase in upstream intrabolus pressure with the increase in the bolus volume 20 - 22 , or a likely increase in the base of the tongue pressure. However, a previous investigation did not find alterations in the maximal tongue base pressure with the variation of bolus volumes 23 . The explanation for the alteration of the bolus transit duration might be the UES alteration with the increase in the bolus volume, with a decrease in the minimal UES pressure with the increase in the bolus volume 23 , which could facilitate bolus propulsion and transit through the pharynx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The faster pharyngeal bolus transit might be associated with the increase in upstream intrabolus pressure with the increase in the bolus volume 20 - 22 , or a likely increase in the base of the tongue pressure. However, a previous investigation did not find alterations in the maximal tongue base pressure with the variation of bolus volumes 23 . The explanation for the alteration of the bolus transit duration might be the UES alteration with the increase in the bolus volume, with a decrease in the minimal UES pressure with the increase in the bolus volume 23 , which could facilitate bolus propulsion and transit through the pharynx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, a previous investigation did not find alterations in the maximal tongue base pressure with the variation of bolus volumes 23 . The explanation for the alteration of the bolus transit duration might be the UES alteration with the increase in the bolus volume, with a decrease in the minimal UES pressure with the increase in the bolus volume 23 , which could facilitate bolus propulsion and transit through the pharynx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Das Druckmaximum im oÖS nach der Relaxation zeigte ebenfalls keine volumenabhängigen Unterschiede [14]. Ryu et al geben zwar ebenfalls eine Zunahme der velopharyngealen Kontraktionsdauer an, volumenabhängige Veränderungen im Hypopharynx wurden aber nicht beobachtet [15]. Die Zunahme des Residualdrucks im oÖS sowie eine Verlängerung der Relaxationszeit mit steigendem Schluckvolumen wurde von Lin et al bestätigt [2].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Differences in bolus sizes and textures have additionally been evaluated [83,84]. Pharyngeal HRM has also been used to evaluate pharyngeal dysphagia in patients - for example, those following stroke [85], with Parkinson's disease [86] and with myotonic dystrophy [87].…”
Section: Pharyngeal Manometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research applications of HRM rely heavily on software such as MATLAB to analyse pharyngeal swallowing with custom algorithms outside of commercial HRM devices [78,79,80,81,82,83,91], and reliability of pharyngeal HRM is limited to one study investigating a custom MATLAB programme. The reliability of a custom-designed software programme was evaluated after provision of a 20-min training session to 20 raters with varying experience (e.g., expert and novice speech-language pathologists) [91].…”
Section: Pharyngeal Manometrymentioning
confidence: 99%