2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13592-014-0270-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of brood ester pheromone on foraging behaviour and colony growth in apicultural settings

Abstract: International audienceBrood ester pheromone (BEP) is a pheromone emitted by developing larvae in a honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony. It has been shown to have multiple potential commercially beneficial effects on worker physiology and behaviour, but like other bee pheromones, its effects are likely context dependent. To better understand the utility of BEP treatment, we examined the effects of BEP treatment in an apicultural setting (using a SuperBoost BEP treatment) in two contexts: in newly established colo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later in the Spring, the population of the colony expands rapidly, and the proportion of young bees increases. As the population increases, the field-worker also increases which is similar to the results of Schneider (1992) who investigated that pollen collection dominated foraging activity, and that there was a positive correlation between the amount of brood comb in the colonies and the proportion of daily foraging dances (Peso and Barron 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Later in the Spring, the population of the colony expands rapidly, and the proportion of young bees increases. As the population increases, the field-worker also increases which is similar to the results of Schneider (1992) who investigated that pollen collection dominated foraging activity, and that there was a positive correlation between the amount of brood comb in the colonies and the proportion of daily foraging dances (Peso and Barron 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%