2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of cancer progression on the viscoelasticity of ovarian cell cytoskeleton structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
184
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
16
184
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, they mostly fall within the range (10 4 , 10 6 ) Hz, an interval compatible with LITUS, which is already widely employed for medical applications. Peak frequency values outside this interval are found for the sole cases associated with extreme limit situations, that is, both when the cells behave as fluid-like (Maxwell) viscoelastic materials and exhibit the bladder cells [29] kidney cells [32] breast cells [30] prostate cells [30] thyroid cells [33] mouse ovarian epithelia [34] breast cells [35] prostate cells [36] bladder cells [29] breast cells [28] breast cells [26] cells of the lung [26] Figure 6. Bar chart with a synopsis of the theoretically derived in-frequency responses of healthy and cancer cells whose mechanical properties have been experimentally measured: the histograms compare peak frequencies for each tumour and normal cell line pair examined, by averaging over all the results obtained from the six viscoelastic schemes used.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, they mostly fall within the range (10 4 , 10 6 ) Hz, an interval compatible with LITUS, which is already widely employed for medical applications. Peak frequency values outside this interval are found for the sole cases associated with extreme limit situations, that is, both when the cells behave as fluid-like (Maxwell) viscoelastic materials and exhibit the bladder cells [29] kidney cells [32] breast cells [30] prostate cells [30] thyroid cells [33] mouse ovarian epithelia [34] breast cells [35] prostate cells [36] bladder cells [29] breast cells [28] breast cells [26] cells of the lung [26] Figure 6. Bar chart with a synopsis of the theoretically derived in-frequency responses of healthy and cancer cells whose mechanical properties have been experimentally measured: the histograms compare peak frequencies for each tumour and normal cell line pair examined, by averaging over all the results obtained from the six viscoelastic schemes used.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research studies have focused solely on the elasticity aspect of the cells [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Elasticity alone, however, is not representative of the cell's full mechanical characteristics; biological cells are viscoelastic, meaning that they exhibit a time-dependent response to an applied load due to internal frictional interactions of the cell's contents and organelles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, however, there have been only a few studies on the viscosity of cancer cells using AFM. For instance, it has been shown that normal thyroid cells have a higher viscosity than cancerous cells or that viscosity decreases significantly from normal ovarian surface epithelial cells to their tumorigenic counterparts [12,30]. Viscoelasticity studies can be useful in many areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During neoplastic progression, increased dysregulation of the cytoskeleton organization was observed, which 14 was recently found to be associated with stage specific changes in their biomechanical properties. 15 The MOSE model exemplifies an alternative to human cell lines since comparable human cell lines providing different stages of ovarian cancer derived from the same woman are not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%