2014
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.975188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of cognitive load on attention control in subclinical anxiety and generalised anxiety disorder

Abstract: Poor regulation of emotions may involve impaired attention control. In the current paper, we report the results of two studies examining the interaction of anxiety, attention control, and cognitive load. In Study I, using a performance-based task to assess attention control, we examined whether anxiety is associated with impaired attention control, and whether these effects are influenced by working memory load. In Study II we examined these effects in patients with a diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This threat-related hypervigilance is a prominent symptom of clinical anxiety, cutting across multiple diagnoses 2 , and these results suggest that it may be mediated by a hyperactive parietal cortex 33,34,36,38,39 . This diminished attention control may explain why (1) individuals with specific phobias may show attentional biases to threatening information [40][41][42][43] , (2) generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients have difficulties maintaining attentional focus [44][45][46][47] anxiety interferes with the manipulation of items in working memory 29 . If this is the case, then inhibitory parietal rTMS should also reduce the attention bias to threat seen in anxiety patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This threat-related hypervigilance is a prominent symptom of clinical anxiety, cutting across multiple diagnoses 2 , and these results suggest that it may be mediated by a hyperactive parietal cortex 33,34,36,38,39 . This diminished attention control may explain why (1) individuals with specific phobias may show attentional biases to threatening information [40][41][42][43] , (2) generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients have difficulties maintaining attentional focus [44][45][46][47] anxiety interferes with the manipulation of items in working memory 29 . If this is the case, then inhibitory parietal rTMS should also reduce the attention bias to threat seen in anxiety patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study participants were selected from a participant pool according to their self-reported trait anxiety scores. Although previous studies have shown similar effect sizes in clinical and subclinical groups for threat-related attentional bias (Bar-Haim, Lamy, Pergamin, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & van, 2007) and attentional control (Najmi, Amir, Frosio, & Ayers, 2015;Vytal, Cornwell, Letkiewicz, Arkin, & Grillon, 2013) findings require replication in clinical groups. Our findings support frameworks that highlight working memory and executive control processes as therapeutic targets in anxiety and invite future trial protocols to examine improvements in processing efficiency and effectiveness across behaviour, peripheral and electrocortical markers, in addition to self-report symptoms of anxiety.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…First, this study did not consider several individual difference, including childhood experiences, anxiety trait or childhood adversity—all of which can affect approach and avoidance behaviors (De Carli, Riem Madelon, & Parolin, ) and moderate the effect of cognitive load (Hiraoka & Nomura, ; Najmi, Amir, Frosio, & Ayers, ). It is possible that such individual differences may moderate the effect of cognitive load on postural and physiological responses to infant vocalization; therefore, future studies should examine the more comprehensive mechanism of mothers’ responses to infants’ emotional vocalizations by considering personal characteristics as an individual‐difference factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%