2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2016.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of collecting and connecting activities on knowledge creation in organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
3
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptually, the associations build on the input (support) -process (activities) -output (knowledge creation) model (Hackman & Morris, 1975;McGrath, 1964) and the enabler (support) -knowledge process (activities) -intermediate output (knowledge creation) model (H. Lee & Choi, 2003). Our findings corroborate that tool support for knowledge activities that connect individual contributions, both from within the group and from a wider network, supports collective knowledge creation in SME networks (Kaschig et al, 2016).…”
Section: Identifying Changes In Practicesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conceptually, the associations build on the input (support) -process (activities) -output (knowledge creation) model (Hackman & Morris, 1975;McGrath, 1964) and the enabler (support) -knowledge process (activities) -intermediate output (knowledge creation) model (H. Lee & Choi, 2003). Our findings corroborate that tool support for knowledge activities that connect individual contributions, both from within the group and from a wider network, supports collective knowledge creation in SME networks (Kaschig et al, 2016).…”
Section: Identifying Changes In Practicesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The highest value appears to be placed on the early stages of knowledge creation (making individual knowledge explicit and integrating this into group knowledge) rather than on the institutionalisation of such knowledge. Thus, our associations between tool functionality, changed practices and knowledge creation resonate with empirical results confirming the positive effects of technology support for knowledge activities on individual and collective knowledge creation (Kaschig, Maier, & Sandow, 2016). Conceptually, the associations build on the input (support) -process (activities) -output (knowledge creation) model (Hackman & Morris, 1975;McGrath, 1964) and the enabler (support) -knowledge process (activities) -intermediate output (knowledge creation) model (H. Lee & Choi, 2003).…”
Section: Identifying Changes In Practicesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Desde la concepción del modelo de Nonaka y Takeuchi (1995), la vida ha cambiado mucho y a raíz del boom de creación de software y de información se ha encontrado que las comunidades de creadores y usuarios de software han desarrollado prácticas que incentivan la creación del conocimiento (Kaschig et al, 2016;López-Portillo Romano 2018;Von Hippel, 2005). 2020;Isaacson, 2014;Papa et al, 2020;Von Hippel, 2005).…”
Section: Gestión Del Conocimiento Y Transferenciaunclassified
“…Knowledge and information have become key factors for success in the twenty-first century (Dominici et al, 2016;Peppard and Ward, 2016). Network economics considers integration as a strategic instrument that affects the production of knowledge and the increasingly important role of information with the implementation of the collective knowledge that is created, accumulated and refined in collective learning (Maier, 2007;Kaschig et al, 2016;Héraud, 2016). As such, collective knowledge is essential to the modern knowledge society and is constituted from the culture (Mantzavinos, 2001), institutions (Biddle, 1990) and technology (Boisot, 1998).…”
Section: Collective Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%