2010
DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.47.2.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Consumer Prior Knowledge and Processing Strategies on Judgments

Abstract: Four studies examine how consumers' prior knowledge of a product category and the way they process product information affect evaluation. Consumers with extensive prior knowledge of a category evaluate the brand more favorably when the presentation of the product information prompts a sense of progress rather than facilitating a detailed assessment (Studies 1 and 2), as well as when the information presentation involves a high level of construal rather than a low level (Studies 3 and 4). Consumers with limited… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
64
2
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
64
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior research used various paradigms to assess expertise, including the frequency of performing goal-related actions (Bettman and Park 1980;Kiel and Layton 1981), prior knowledge (Hong and Sternthal 2010), and formal training (Hutchinson 1983; for a summary, see Alba and Hutchinson 1987). In our studies, we rely on these various definitions to operationalize expertise.…”
Section: Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research used various paradigms to assess expertise, including the frequency of performing goal-related actions (Bettman and Park 1980;Kiel and Layton 1981), prior knowledge (Hong and Sternthal 2010), and formal training (Hutchinson 1983; for a summary, see Alba and Hutchinson 1987). In our studies, we rely on these various definitions to operationalize expertise.…”
Section: Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O conhecimento da marca, abarcando seu nível de consciência e de associação a uma imagem, é a resposta imediata de efetividade das declarações de posicionamento (Hong & Sternthal, 2010;Keller, 1993). Para tanto, é necessário que o conteúdo da mensagem da declaração do posicionamento seja assimilado pelos consumidores (Meyers-Levy & Sternthal, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Há falta de estudos acerca dos contextos de efetividade tanto no nível da categoria e no nível da marca quanto também na própria medida da efetividade percebida pelo consumidor. Algumas situações pouco investigadas dizem respeito ao (1) contraste entre novidade da categoria versus categoria tradicional (Hong & Sternthal, 2010;Nedungadi, Chattopadhyay, & Muthukrishnan, 2001;Tybout & Sternthal, 2010), (2) ao nível pré-existente da força da marca que está sendo feito o trabalho de posicionamento (Alba & Chattopadhyay, 1985;Kohli, Leuthesser, & Suri, 2007;Tybout & Sternthal, 2010), (3) à medida da efetividade no conhecimento -lembrança versus imagem associada (Dimofte & Yalch, 2011;Keller, 1993;Till, Baack, & Waterman, 2011) -, (4) às idiossincrasias da declaração do posicionamento (Rucker & Sternthal, 2010), (5) ao tipo de público-alvo exposto (Rossolatos, 2014;Tybout & Sternthal, 2010) e (6) à comparação da efetividade intra marcas e entre marcas da mesma categoria (Burke & Srull, 1988;Keller & Lehmann, 2006;Porto & Oliveira-Castro, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Remarkably, consumer behavior and managerial decision-making theories (Engel, Kollat & Blackwell, 1968;Howard & Sheth, 1969) can provide a new perspective on this issue. Within this behavioral conceptual framework, the decision to use BSS is conceived as the result of a multi-stage process, let loose by the individual's motivation and previous experience, and throughout which he or she searches for and evaluates information about alternate services before making a decision (Hong & Sternthal, 2010;Kuskov & Villas-Boas, 2010;Mehta, Hoegg & Chakravarti, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%