1997
DOI: 10.21061/jcte.v13i2.671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects Of Cooperative Learning Methods On Achievement, Retention, And Attitudes Of Home Economics Students In North Carolina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
8
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the posttest and delay test mean scores of students in the GTG were higher than those of students in the conventional teaching group. The findings of the above studies validate the results of a two-week period conducted by Abu & Flowers (1997) in which the effectiveness of the STAD method and lecture-based teaching method were compared on two dependent variables (achievement, and retention) in a home economic course in a University in America. A cooperative learning group received the STAD technique and a control group received conventional teaching.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The results show that the posttest and delay test mean scores of students in the GTG were higher than those of students in the conventional teaching group. The findings of the above studies validate the results of a two-week period conducted by Abu & Flowers (1997) in which the effectiveness of the STAD method and lecture-based teaching method were compared on two dependent variables (achievement, and retention) in a home economic course in a University in America. A cooperative learning group received the STAD technique and a control group received conventional teaching.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…They remembered approximately 99 percent of their post experiment knowledge when tested a month later on the delay test of achievement. This ratio validates, to some extent, the results of those studies reviewed earlier (Abu & Flowers, 1997;Tanel & Erol, 2008;Sahin, 2010, & Wyk, 2010 which reported that students in both cooperative learning group and traditional teaching groups have a similar percentage of knowledge retention on the delay test of achievement. In this study, a possible explanation for the similarity in knowledge retention could be that Vietnamese tertiary students are very adept at learning meaningfully from lecture-based teaching.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…An inspection of scores for each group shows that both group had similar retention (approximately 99%) on the delay test of achievement. The findings of the above studies validate the results of a two-week period conducted by Abu & Flowers (1997) in which the effectiveness of the STAD method and lecture-based teaching method were compared on two dependent variables (achievement, and retention) in a home economic course in a University in America. A cooperative learning group (n = 91) received the STAD technique and a control group (n = 106) received conventional teaching.…”
Section: Cooperative Learning Research In the Western Contextsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In addition, the literature suggests that additional reasons may motivate the instructors to use cooperative learning techniques. For instance, "the ability to work with others within a group and to develop interpersonal skills" might be an acceptable justification for implementing cooperative learning strategies (Abu and Flowers, 1997 When I work with other students I achieve more than when I work alone. 3 Cooperative learning can improve my attitude towards work.…”
Section: B the Overall Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%