1996
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Student Achievement and Motivation in a High School Geometry Class

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
7
34
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings obtained from the attitude survey support this interpretation, since students in the treatment group valued the effectiveness of discussing and sharing information, and teaching others in groups. The findings of this study supported the results reported from recent studies (Iqbal, 2004;Mehra & Thakur, 2008;Chianson et al, 2010;Kvam, 2000;Tanel & Erol, 2008;Nassal, 2009;Nichols, 2002;Webb, 2008) that indicate that students yielded better mean gains on retention scores through cooperative learning than via conventional group learning.…”
Section: Knowledge Retentionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings obtained from the attitude survey support this interpretation, since students in the treatment group valued the effectiveness of discussing and sharing information, and teaching others in groups. The findings of this study supported the results reported from recent studies (Iqbal, 2004;Mehra & Thakur, 2008;Chianson et al, 2010;Kvam, 2000;Tanel & Erol, 2008;Nassal, 2009;Nichols, 2002;Webb, 2008) that indicate that students yielded better mean gains on retention scores through cooperative learning than via conventional group learning.…”
Section: Knowledge Retentionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, in Mehra & Thakur's (2008) study, students within the cooperative group significantly outperformed students in the lecture-based setting when it came to recalling what was taught. The results of some additional studies (Chianson, Kurumeh & Obida, 2010;Kvam, 2000;Tanel & Erol, 2008;Nassal, 2009;Nichols, 2002;Webb, 2008) also show that lecture-based teaching is less effective in improving knowledge retention than cooperative learning methods which involve students teaching students.…”
Section: Knowledge Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I could not think of this solution. ) There are loads of studies in the literature which show that cooperative learning method improves the attitudes of students towards mathematics class (Gelici & Bilgin, 2012;Gök, Doğan, Doymuş, & Karaçöp 2009;Lazrowitz, Lazarowitz, & Baird, 1994;Nichols & Hall, 1995;Tlusty, 1993;Ural, 2007;Dimabuyo & Portia, 2011;Yıldırım, 2011). In this study, the prospective teachers expressed opinions which say this method will be beneficial in developing positive attitude towards mathematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also revealed increased engagement with mathematical tasks for highly motivated students. Other research suggests that students who have high intrinsic math motivation may also have a greater conceptual knowledge of math topics [20,34,48]. In short, previous research points toward a link between student motivation and achievement.…”
Section: Motivation and Student Achievementmentioning
confidence: 98%