2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijebr.2017.081772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of corporate governance attributes and code amendments on the performance of Malaysian trading and services firms

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the impact of corporate governance attributes and code amendments of 2012 on the performance of 162 trading and services listed firms in Bursa Malaysia. A corporate governance index score adopted from the Taylor model and formulated based on the MCCG best practices is used to measure the corporate governance attribute's level. Return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE) and market return measurement (Tobin's Q) are used in this study. A panel data test has been conducted follo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Malaysian code was implemented to instil principles and best corporate governance practices within publicly listed companies, promoting good corporate governance. Furthermore, the code emphasizes internal and external auditing as crucial for monitoring and controlling corporate activities (Laallam et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Malaysian code was implemented to instil principles and best corporate governance practices within publicly listed companies, promoting good corporate governance. Furthermore, the code emphasizes internal and external auditing as crucial for monitoring and controlling corporate activities (Laallam et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of bank profitability has been a subject of controversy in the literature. While Laallam et al (2017) argue for Return on Equity (ROE) as the optimal measure, Qing et al (2020) suggest the alternative use of Return on Assets (ROA). Hernando and Nieto (2007) contest the use of ROA because of its sensitivity to industry variations and dependence on credit allocation thresholds, proposing ROE as a more robust measure.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging this tradeoff, our study incorporates both ROE and ROA. Researchers highlight the importance of distinguishing between online banking modes, with a particular focus on the impact of how bank profitability is measured (Abde Latif Awwad and Abdallh Salem 2019; Laallam et al 2017;Qing et al 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%