2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0132-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain: a systematic review protocol

Abstract: BackgroundA significant proportion of women exceeds or does not meet the Institute of Medicine’s gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines. Inadequate, excessive GWG or weight loss during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of negative maternal and fetal outcomes. Among the many determinants of GWG identified in the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines, culture was named as one of the few whose influence has not been fully explored. Some cultural beliefs may erroneously promote overeating as “eating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cultural differences are likely to play an important role in weight gain [27] and could explain the differences that we found related to ethnicity. Prepregnancy BMI, with an increased risk for overweight and obese women, has already been described as a significant predictor of total gestational weight gain [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural differences are likely to play an important role in weight gain [27] and could explain the differences that we found related to ethnicity. Prepregnancy BMI, with an increased risk for overweight and obese women, has already been described as a significant predictor of total gestational weight gain [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systematic review was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database (#CRD42015023399) and the protocol published elsewhere (Manyanga et al., 2015). This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is the standard and recommended by the Ministry of Health in Brazil, Atalah’s curve has limitations, such as a lack of upper limits for pregnant women classified as obese and lower limits for pregnant women classified as underweight 9 , 12 . Atalah’s curve was developed in the 1990s; since then, there have been changes in behavior and gestational weight recommendations, as well as cultural and racial influences that might impact the results in different countries 16 , 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These new curves seem to be useful and provide another tool for health professionals to monitor maternal health. In addition, depending on the provider’s decision, they can follow only women who are in the upper or lower limits for WG 11 , 23 , 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%