2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of default and call risk on bond duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sovereign risk-adjusted duration ranges from 64% of its Macaulay duration counterpart for AAA-rated bonds to 5% for B or lower rated bonds, respectively. The monotonic 'shortening' effect of sovereign risk on bond duration echoes the findings of Xie et al (2009) on the effect of default risk on noncallable US corporate bonds. Hull et al (2004) and Norden and Weber (2004) show that bond rating changes lag changes in CDS prices, while both ratings and CDS prices are driven by the credit quality of issuers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The sovereign risk-adjusted duration ranges from 64% of its Macaulay duration counterpart for AAA-rated bonds to 5% for B or lower rated bonds, respectively. The monotonic 'shortening' effect of sovereign risk on bond duration echoes the findings of Xie et al (2009) on the effect of default risk on noncallable US corporate bonds. Hull et al (2004) and Norden and Weber (2004) show that bond rating changes lag changes in CDS prices, while both ratings and CDS prices are driven by the credit quality of issuers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…To properly use the readily available Macaulay duration for managing interest rate risk, we must link the Macaulay duration to the effective duration appropriately. Xie et al (2009) derive a general relation between the risk-adjusted (i.e. default risk-, call risk-, and default and call risk-adjusted) effective duration and the Macaulay duration.…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations