2008
DOI: 10.1577/m07-014.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Derelict Blue Crab Traps on Marine Organisms in the Lower York River, Virginia

Abstract: Abstract.-Derelict (abandoned or lost) traps targeting blue crab Callinectes sapidus have the potential to affect the blue crab fishery and other marine-oriented species. We used sidescan sonar to locate derelict traps and assess their extent and accumulation rate. Experimental traps were monitored at four locations to calculate catch rates of marine organisms and trap degradation rates. In 2006, 635-676 derelict traps were identified in a 33.5-km 2 area of the lower York River in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many studies have quantifi ed the effects of ghost fi shing, most estimate the number of animals killed per unit of time (e.g., Breen, 1987;Hebert et al, 2001), the number killed per pot per unit of time (e.g., Bullimore et al, 2001;Al-Masroori et al, 2004;Campbell and Sumpton, 2009), or simply the number of crabs caught per pot (e.g., Stevens et al, 2000;Havens et al, 2008). These studies focus on following or recovering lost gear and examining catches and mortality over time on a local population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although many studies have quantifi ed the effects of ghost fi shing, most estimate the number of animals killed per unit of time (e.g., Breen, 1987;Hebert et al, 2001), the number killed per pot per unit of time (e.g., Bullimore et al, 2001;Al-Masroori et al, 2004;Campbell and Sumpton, 2009), or simply the number of crabs caught per pot (e.g., Stevens et al, 2000;Havens et al, 2008). These studies focus on following or recovering lost gear and examining catches and mortality over time on a local population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even after they are lost, nets can continue to entangle and kill organisms (Kaiser et al, 1996;Santos et al, 2003;Baeta et al, 2009), and fi sh traps and crustacean pots can continue to attract, trap, and kill target and nontarget species (Stevens et al, 2000;Hebert et al, 2001;Erzini et al, 2008;Ramirez-Rodriguez and Arreguin-Sanchez, 2008), such as reptiles, birds, and mammals (Havens et al, 2008;Good et al, 2009;2010). Dead animals in crab pots and fi sh nets can then act as bait to attract even more organisms (Havens et al, 2008). Although in some cases these effects are negligible, in many cases, depending on the type of gear and the environment (Gerrodette et al, 1990;Santos et al, 2003), ghost fi shing represents a substantial economic loss to the fi shery (e.g., Breen, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, when hardshell crab pots placed in deeper water break free from their moorings or are abandoned, they may be carried by storms or tidal currents into shallow-water habitat. Though they are never baited, these ghost or derelict pots are potential, chronic causes of bycatch mortality (Roosenburg 1991;Guillory and Prejean 1998;Havens et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debris can directly damage vessels involved in leisure, transport or fishing (Takehama 1989). In addition to the direct damages to vessels sustained as a result of encounters with marine debris, ghost nets and other discarded fishing gear can have ramifications for fisheries industries, by decreasing target stock levels and their prey items, and damaging sensitive habitat (Matsuoka et al 2005;Havens et al 2008). Debris can also be detrimental to the tourism industry through reduced or altered visitation to beaches, as well as to potential losses in private sector investment in dirty or polluted areas (Ballance et al 2000;Ofiara 2001).…”
Section: Figure 11 Debris On An Indonesian Beach Photo By Diana Klementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debris also has aesthetic and economic consequences, and may result in decreased tourism (Ballance et al 2000), reduced economic benefits from fisheries (Havens et al 2008), and damage to vessels (Jones 1995). Furthermore, debris destroys habitats and aids in the transport of invasive species (Sheavly & Register 2007).…”
Section: Debris Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%