1988
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(88)90411-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of detergent on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of blood group substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Although promising, such sensitive force measurements required the use of a noncommercial AFM system. 11 Surfactants have been widely employed in traditional immunoassay formats, including radiolabeling, 12 solidphase immunofiltration, 13 and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, [14][15][16] to reduce background signal caused by nonspecific protein-protein adsorption. 12,[16][17][18][19] Prior work suggests that nonspecific adsorption of proteinaceous material via primarily hydrophobic interactions is greatly reduced using nonionic surfactants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Although promising, such sensitive force measurements required the use of a noncommercial AFM system. 11 Surfactants have been widely employed in traditional immunoassay formats, including radiolabeling, 12 solidphase immunofiltration, 13 and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, [14][15][16] to reduce background signal caused by nonspecific protein-protein adsorption. 12,[16][17][18][19] Prior work suggests that nonspecific adsorption of proteinaceous material via primarily hydrophobic interactions is greatly reduced using nonionic surfactants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surfactants have been widely employed in traditional immunoassay formats, including radiolabeling, solid-phase immunofiltration, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, to reduce background signal caused by nonspecific protein−protein adsorption. , Prior work suggests that nonspecific adsorption of proteinaceous material via primarily hydrophobic interactions is greatly reduced using nonionic surfactants . Indeed, several groups have reported that the addition of Tween 20, Triton X-100, and Tween 80 to antibody−antigen precipitation studies greatly reduced nonspecific adhesion. ,, Such surfactants have also been shown to reduce nonspecific protein−protein interactions in other immunoassay formats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, high concentrations of detergent, which are often used in harvesting protein from cells, can lead to displacement of adsorbed antigen probes from assay surfaces, e.g., ELISA. 68 Con-sequently, the interrogation of biological samples containing detergents could disrupt assay sensitivity by affecting the stability of noncovalently bound SBPs on the sensor surface. Such noncovalent functionalization, however, could also allow facile regeneration of the sensor surface, whereby the sensor can be reused repeatedly after stripping the spent biofunctional layer.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the stability of the antigen was an initial problem, SDS denaturation of the purified rRCT rendered the antigen stable over time and temperatures and did not affect antibody binding to the non-conformationally dependent epitope. As long as the SDS concentration is kept below its critical micelle concentration, it has been shown to improve ELISA responses in other systems (15). Bacterial lysate containing rRAP-1 from B. caballi is similarly heat sensitive but also is stabilized in the presence of SDS (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%