1984
DOI: 10.1086/467067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Different Contractual Arrangements: The Case of Retail Gasoline Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
1
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
37
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is most apt to occur when the agency believes that the vertical structure is exacerbating horizontal market power. The three studies that assess gasoline divorcement directly (Barron and Umbeck (1984), Vita (2000) and Blass and Carlton (2001)) conclude that retail prices and costs were higher and hours were shorter after it occurred. In other words, they are unanimous in concluding that the policy was misguided.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is most apt to occur when the agency believes that the vertical structure is exacerbating horizontal market power. The three studies that assess gasoline divorcement directly (Barron and Umbeck (1984), Vita (2000) and Blass and Carlton (2001)) conclude that retail prices and costs were higher and hours were shorter after it occurred. In other words, they are unanimous in concluding that the policy was misguided.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies as early as Livingston and Levitt (1959) found a distinct difference in gasoline prices depending on the type of retail outlet; larger national outlets associated with specific refineries versus smaller independent local businesses that purchased their gas at the lowest price possible. Marvel (1976) found that higher-priced gas stations (typically branded, in a contractual arrangement with a specific refiner) showed smaller price fluctuation, a distinction continued by the work of Barron and Umbeck (1984), Comonor and Riddle (2003) and a result confirmed by Deck and Wilson (2008). The Federal Trade Commission (2005) confirms that increased competition leads to lower gas prices, but only at a marginal level.…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies dealt with retail prices of gasoline in the USA (Barron and Umbeck, 1984;Shepard, 1993), prices charged by retailers of soft-drink bottlers (Muris, Scheffman and Spiller, 1992), beer sold in public houses in the UK (Slade, 1998), and the USA fast-food industry (Graddy, 1995;Lafontaine, 1995). Within car distribution itself, Smith II (1982) estimates a more than nine percent successive monopoly price distortion in states where an exclusive territory has been legislatively expanded by "relevant market area" laws that prevent car manufacturers from freely adding new franchisees in an area with established franchisees.…”
Section: Agents' Free Ridingmentioning
confidence: 99%