2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of different feeding rates and re-feeding of Litopenaeus vannamei in a biofloc culture system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fasting did not affect negatively shrimp survival and they probably used the biofloc in an attempt to meet their energy requirement for maintenance. Similarly, Lara et al () found that Litopenaeus vannamei reared in BFT system and subjected to greater feeding restrictions had lower final weight but survival was not compromised. In the present study, survival was even higher in the feeding restriction treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the fasting did not affect negatively shrimp survival and they probably used the biofloc in an attempt to meet their energy requirement for maintenance. Similarly, Lara et al () found that Litopenaeus vannamei reared in BFT system and subjected to greater feeding restrictions had lower final weight but survival was not compromised. In the present study, survival was even higher in the feeding restriction treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The biofloc system may also have influenced the enzyme activity in this study as it has the capacity to produce a large bacterial biomass (Ebelling et al., ), as well as it is constantly available for shrimp consumption (Lara et al., ). These bacteria accounts for water quality maintenance, contributes to floc formulation that is also a food source for shrimp, can act as probiotics and has the ability to produce a large diversity of exoenzymes with the function of breaking down organic compounds and, thus, help digestion (Moriarty, ; Tacon et al., ; Wasielesky et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment lasted 35 days and consisted of four treatments with three repetitions each, corresponding to the following feeding frequencies and respective times: one time a day at 8:00 a.m.; two times a day at 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.; three times a day at 8:00 a.m.; 12:00 noon and 4:00 p.m.; and four times a day at 8:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., 12:00 noon and 4:00 p.m. These diurnal feeding practices are typical for L. vannamei nursery in Brazil (Lara et al., ; Silva et al., ). Postlarvae were fed commercial feed with 420G crude protein per kilo feed (Purina, São Lourenço da Mata, Brazil) at the corresponding feeding frequency and adjusted according to Jory ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overfeeding generally results in higher production costs and has negative effects on fish or crayfish growth. Currently, lower feeding levels are recommended by many authors, and some studies suggest that natural food items in ponds can save up to 24.79%–50% of the artificial feed, for instance, in L. vannamei culture (Gamboa‐Delgado, Pena‐Rodriguez, Ricque‐Marie, & Cruz‐Suarez, ; Lara, Hostins, Bezerra, Poersch, & Wasielesky, ; Roy, Davis, & Whitis, ). Results from numerous experiments on fish have also demonstrated that reducing feeding levels to 65% satiation for Scophthalmus maximus (Van Ham et al, ), and to 90% satiation for P. olivaceus (Cho et al, ) does not reduce their production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%