2020
DOI: 10.3390/nu12020365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Different Quantities and Qualities of Protein Intake in People with Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract: The recommended amount and quality of protein in diets of diabetic patients are highly controversial. In order to provide evidence-based information, the Diabetes Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) used a grading procedure used for quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (GRADE). A protein intake of 10% to 20% of energy intake (E%) or about 0.8 to 1.3 g/kg body weight in people below 65 years of age, and 15% to 20% of E% in people above 65 years of age appeared safe in weight-stable conditions. There wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
14

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
38
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…A relative paucity of dietary fibre intake in the LCD (from the predominance of animal-based high fat and high protein foods, and relative lack of plant-based foods that contain carbohydrates in the form of dietary fibre) may cause constipation and other health problems [ 44 ]. Over the longer term, these imbalances of macronutrient intake can have potentially deleterious effects that stem from relatively high dietary intakes of fat (such as dyslipidaemia [ 12 ]) and protein (such as impaired glomerular filtration rate demonstrated in women with mild renal impairment, but not in healthy subjects with eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [ 11 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]). Furthermore, diets that have both low and high percentages of carbohydrates associate with increased mortality, with minimal mortality risk at 50–55% carbohydrate intake (with a plant-based diet) [ 48 ].…”
Section: Potential Safety Concerns Of the Lcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A relative paucity of dietary fibre intake in the LCD (from the predominance of animal-based high fat and high protein foods, and relative lack of plant-based foods that contain carbohydrates in the form of dietary fibre) may cause constipation and other health problems [ 44 ]. Over the longer term, these imbalances of macronutrient intake can have potentially deleterious effects that stem from relatively high dietary intakes of fat (such as dyslipidaemia [ 12 ]) and protein (such as impaired glomerular filtration rate demonstrated in women with mild renal impairment, but not in healthy subjects with eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [ 11 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]). Furthermore, diets that have both low and high percentages of carbohydrates associate with increased mortality, with minimal mortality risk at 50–55% carbohydrate intake (with a plant-based diet) [ 48 ].…”
Section: Potential Safety Concerns Of the Lcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up, consumption of energy from protein at the expense of energy from fat or carbohydrates actually increased the risk for the development of T2D [ 53 , 54 ]. Conversely, a recent guidelines publication by the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) justified higher protein diets (up to 20% and 1.3 g/Kg body weight) for the treatment of T2D, providing normal renal function [ 47 ]. Interestingly, there appears to be a contradiction between the epidemiological and interventional studies on high-protein diets, with the latter (20–30% daily energy requirements from dietary protein in the context of a healthy dietary intake of fats, fibres and vegetables) showing consistently favourable metabolic outcomes and biomarkers.…”
Section: Potential Safety Concerns Of the Lcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there are no real long-term intervention trials on high protein diets in people with diabetes. 81 . .…”
Section: Low-carbohydrate Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attitude to high protein diets is controversial, as the current ADA's recommendations [3] and that of the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) for EASD are aiming to present [16]. This controversy originates from the fact that there are no real long-term intervention trials on high protein diets in people with diabetes [16]. Furthermore, ADA's recommendations also include some reservations with regard to high protein diets [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, ADA's recommendations also include some reservations with regard to high protein diets [3]. A recent meta-analysis published in Nutrients concludes that the safety of high protein diets has been documented for one year only [16]. As said above, the quality or quantity of dietary protein does not seem to play any role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes, whereas, regarding type 2 diabetes, higher intakes of red meat and processed meat products have been consistently associated with the increased risk of type 2 diabetes [12] and other chronic non-communicable diseases [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%