2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of drip irrigation on flowering and flower quality of glasshouse gladiolus plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basing on flower numbers, and according to the commercial classification of gladiolus flower stems (Table 3), the wood ash dose of 11.64 g dm -3 and 32.71% volumetric soil moisture would be appropriate for production of flower stems classified as II; considering commercial economic values, such category would still generate a satisfactory income to the producer. Greater flower numbers obtained with increasing water levels was also observed by Bastug et al (2006), that working with three irrigation treatments (0, 50, 75, and 100% evapotranspiration), reported a higher flowering percentage obtained when plants were cultivated under 86.2% water replacement level, followed by 75.2% and 58.1% levels. As Taiz and Zeiger (2006) reported, variations in water availability to a crop is subjective and may influence the physiological responses of the plant, since in water stress conditions (scarcity or excess), various physiological processes are changed, such as photosynthesis, stomatal opening, production of abscisic acid, leaf abscission and osmotic adjustment, thus dramatically reducing the productivity of ornamental plants.…”
Section: Flower Numbersmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Basing on flower numbers, and according to the commercial classification of gladiolus flower stems (Table 3), the wood ash dose of 11.64 g dm -3 and 32.71% volumetric soil moisture would be appropriate for production of flower stems classified as II; considering commercial economic values, such category would still generate a satisfactory income to the producer. Greater flower numbers obtained with increasing water levels was also observed by Bastug et al (2006), that working with three irrigation treatments (0, 50, 75, and 100% evapotranspiration), reported a higher flowering percentage obtained when plants were cultivated under 86.2% water replacement level, followed by 75.2% and 58.1% levels. As Taiz and Zeiger (2006) reported, variations in water availability to a crop is subjective and may influence the physiological responses of the plant, since in water stress conditions (scarcity or excess), various physiological processes are changed, such as photosynthesis, stomatal opening, production of abscisic acid, leaf abscission and osmotic adjustment, thus dramatically reducing the productivity of ornamental plants.…”
Section: Flower Numbersmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Furthermore, Bastug et al (2006) reported that every millimeter of water increases gladiolus flowering percentage at around 0.3% according to irrigation treatments and varieties. However, the highest moisture (125% FC) tested in this study promoted the lowest results for all flowering variables, with the exception of dry matter of flower stems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Wright and Burge (2000) observed that symptoms of water stress include lower growth, what is much apparent in this study. Furthermore, Shillo and Halevy (1976b), Bastug et al (2006), andPereira et al (2009) mentioned that gladiolus vegetative development and flower stem initial growth are the most sensitive stages to soil water shortage. In fact, water deficit permanently affected plant development as, although plants remained alive, such treatment did not promote any flowering, as also reported by Shillo and Halevy (1976a) for gladioli cultivated under low soil moisture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies on estimation of water requirement and crop coefficient have been conducted for open field crops like Cotton (Abdelhadi et al [9] Fisher [10]), Maize (Akinmutimi, [11] Chuanyan and Zhongren [12]), Onion and Spinach (Piccinni et al [13]) Okra (Odofin et al [14] Tiwari et al [3]), Capsicum (Miranda et al [15] Tyagi et al [17] Teff (Araya et al [18]), Sapota (Tiwari et al [4]), Jujube (Hu et al [19]), Pomegranate (Parvizi et al [20]) and greenhouse crops like Tomato (Maldonado et al [21] Gómez et al [22], Wahb-Allah et al [23] Harmanto et al [24]), Eggplant Senyigit et al [25] Melon, Green beans, Watermelon and Pepper (Orgaz et al [26]), Gladiolus (Bastug et al [27]), Cucumber (Zhang et al [28] and Blanco and Folegatti [29]) However, limited studies are found on cultivation of rose crop under greenhouse conditions (Ehret et al [30] Katsoulas et al [31]) and no literature is reported for the estimation of water requirement and crop coefficient of Dutch roses under greenhouse conditions. Therefore, the present study have been undertaken to determine the crop coefficient and water requirement of Dutch rose under greenhouse and open field conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%