1995
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1995.9914977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Drug-Testing Program Characteristics on Applicants' Attitudes Toward Potential Employment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, employees with a history of drug use usually react more negatively to AOD policies than those who have never used drugs (Paronto et al, 2002;Sujak, Villanova, & Daly, 1995;Truxillo, Normandy, & Bauer, 2001;Zinkiewicz, Davey, Obst, & Sheehan, 2000). As collecting accurate information on drug use is difficult due to confidentiality and social desirability, we focused on demographic variables that have been associated with drug use: Gender, work roles, and age.…”
Section: Demographic Influences On Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, employees with a history of drug use usually react more negatively to AOD policies than those who have never used drugs (Paronto et al, 2002;Sujak, Villanova, & Daly, 1995;Truxillo, Normandy, & Bauer, 2001;Zinkiewicz, Davey, Obst, & Sheehan, 2000). As collecting accurate information on drug use is difficult due to confidentiality and social desirability, we focused on demographic variables that have been associated with drug use: Gender, work roles, and age.…”
Section: Demographic Influences On Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, AOD testing has become common (Bahls, 1998). Although testing increases privacy concerns (Gillom, 1994;Hubbart, 1998;Sujak, Villanova, & Daly, 1995), most employees tend to favor testing when jobs involve safety risks or contact with the public (Murphy, Thornton, & Prue, 1991;Tepper, 1994) or when employees have been previously exposed to coworker use (Bennett & Lehman, 1997a). Sanctions associated with testing positive for drugs, such as job loss, may motivate employees to seek help for problems and avoid serious penalties if caught through a positive drug test.…”
Section: The Social Context Of Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, job seekers are less likely to apply to companies that test for drugs and have weak confidentially policies. However, the applicants' reluctance to apply to such companies is mediated by the applicants' positive attitude toward the company and a perception that the testing procedure is fair (Sujak, Villanova, & Daly, 1995). Perhaps a similar phenomenon occurs in student athletes.…”
Section: Expectation Of Privacymentioning
confidence: 99%