2022
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2061053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of dual-task interference on visual search and verbal memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As predicted by MRT, we did observe a dual-task decrement within this study. When compared to the dynamic search task performed by Jackson et al (2022), participants in this study experienced less of a decrement for both tasks. In this experiment, participants found 14.2% less search targets and recalled 27.9% less words when multitasking compared to performing each task individually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As predicted by MRT, we did observe a dual-task decrement within this study. When compared to the dynamic search task performed by Jackson et al (2022), participants in this study experienced less of a decrement for both tasks. In this experiment, participants found 14.2% less search targets and recalled 27.9% less words when multitasking compared to performing each task individually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…We expected to observe a dual-task decrement when participants multitasked as opposed to when they performed the tasks individually. We also expected to find less of a dual-task decrement within this study than in the dynamic search task performed by Jackson et al (2022). Finally, we expected participants to inherently prioritize one task over the other, despite being instructed not to, in the dualtask, where responses to a subjective measure could show task performance differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tais resultados permitiram concluir que a tarefa cognitiva concorre com os desafios de controlo postural. Por outro lado, os autores Jackson et al (2022) avaliaram a performance motora durante uma dupla tarefa com desafio cognitivo de memória, bastante idêntico ao requerido durante o jogo Labirinto. Neste estudo, os autores solicitaram a nomeação de 20 palavras numa tarefa motora de 5 minutos, requerendo posteriormente a sua recapitulação.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The participants at the end of each experimental condition responded with as many of the 20 words as they could recall. This task has been used extensively in dual-task studies (Darling & Helton, 2014; Epling, Blakely, et al, 2016; Epling, Russell, et al, 2016; Epling et al, 2017; Green et al, 2014; Green & Helton, 2011; Jackson et al, 2022; 2023; Stets et al, 2020; Woodham et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%