2019
DOI: 10.1044/2019_jslhr-h-18-0449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception

Abstract: Purpose Spectral modulation detection is an increasingly common assay of suprathreshold auditory perception and has been correlated with speech perception performance. Here, the potential effects of stimulus duration and stimulus presentation level on spectral modulation detection were investigated. Method Spectral modulation detection thresholds were measured as a function of modulation frequency in young, normal-hearing listeners. The s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 Evidence supporting the influence of audibility to ripple perception includes the observations that RPO thresholds decrease at low sensation levels, and individuals with higher aided SII values have better RPO thresholds. Specifically, the perception of rippled noise is known to degrade at low sensation levels, 36 40 ostensibly due to a combination of inaudibility of ripple nulls or portions of the spectrum at low sensation levels; consequently, the participants with a lower aided SII in this study and in Kirby et al 37 might have been less able to resolve spectral peaks due to inaudibility. While Kirby et al 59 did not find a relationship between aided SII and RPO thresholds, the use of participants with high levels of audibility (mean aided SII = 78) may have limited the observed relationship of RPO to aided SII in that study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…58 Evidence supporting the influence of audibility to ripple perception includes the observations that RPO thresholds decrease at low sensation levels, and individuals with higher aided SII values have better RPO thresholds. Specifically, the perception of rippled noise is known to degrade at low sensation levels, 36 40 ostensibly due to a combination of inaudibility of ripple nulls or portions of the spectrum at low sensation levels; consequently, the participants with a lower aided SII in this study and in Kirby et al 37 might have been less able to resolve spectral peaks due to inaudibility. While Kirby et al 59 did not find a relationship between aided SII and RPO thresholds, the use of participants with high levels of audibility (mean aided SII = 78) may have limited the observed relationship of RPO to aided SII in that study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Auditory filter bandwidth increases as degree of HL increases, in turn leading to reduced distinctness of spectral peaks and poorer perception of spectral ripples. 9 36 40 60 Because auditory filter bandwidths are wider at high presentation levels, RPO thresholds decline for elevated presentation levels. 36 40 Consider that the prescribed gain was higher for those with greater HL, resulting in a higher presentation level than for those with lessor HL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is some evidence of a duration effect with broadband stimuli: studying the detection of an 8-dB peak at 3.5 kHz in a broadband noise, Farrar et al (1987) found that thresholds decreased as duration increased up to 300 ms, the maximum duration tested. Isarangura et al (2019) found that the detection of spectral modulation in a broadband noise carrier also improved with increasing duration but reached asymptote by 200 ms. For speech stimuli, measures of duration effects on level discrimination are scant; in a study of overall level discrimination of speech, the threshold for words (mean duration 450 ms) was only significantly worse (greater) than for sentences (mean duration 1533 ms) when participants were aided (Whitmer and Akeroyd, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%