The effects of eliciting implicit versus explicit social support among youths susceptible for late-onset smoking

Abstract

Purpose Adolescents susceptible to late-onset smoking (becoming regular smokers at age 18 or later) are an understudied population. Social support is a promising target for intervention, but it is important to distinguish between implicit social support (reminders that one belongs to a network of valued others) and explicit social support (seeking and receiving advice and emotional solace). This study aimed to test the potential protective influence of implicit and explicit social support on reducing the risk of late-onset smoking. Methods Fifty-eight smoking-susceptible youths (aged 16–18, 45% African American, 55% non-Hispanic White) completed an experimental session that included a video-recording task designed to elicit thoughts about implicit, explicit, or no social support. Youths reported their behavioral willingness and intentions (BW and BI) to smoke immediately following the social support manipulation; a random sample of 39 youths reported again at a 3-week follow-up. Results Following the manipulation, BW and BI for cigarette smoking were significantly higher among youths assigned to the explicit-support condition, compared to those in the implicit-support or control conditions. At follow-up, BW and BI were highest in the explicit-support condition and lowest in the implicit-support condition, but the differences were not significant. Conclusions Overall, findings indicated that for teens susceptible for late-onset smoking, eliciting thoughts about implicit social support produces lower risk for cigarette initiation than does eliciting thoughts about explicit social support. The present results and the video task that yielded them are important to researchers and practitioners interested in reducing the likelihood of late-onset smoking.

Age and Social Support Seeking: Understanding the Role of Perceived Social Costs to Others

“…Next, we primed coping strategies by randomly assigning participants to one of two coping instruction conditions, following the method utilized by Taylor et al (2007) and Roberts, Bernstein, and Colby (2016). Participants in the explicit social support priming condition read, Please take a few minutes to think about those who care about you and to whom you are close.…”

Examining the relationship between social support and tendency to substance use among Iranian earthquake survivors: The mediating role of positive mental health

“…Several studies have shown that social support acts as a potential protective factor against the spread of drug abuse problems, especially for people with a family history of alcohol and drug dependence [2,3,[55][56][57]. Various studies show that in addition to mental health status, another factors play a role in people's tendency to substance use and one of them is the level of social support.…”

The effect of workload on nurses’ quality of life with moderating perceived social support during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Social support is a social network that provides considerable psychological resources for a person, so that he/she will be able to cope with stressful living conditions and daily problems [37]. Social support as one of the emotional coping methods can protect people by preventing the occurrence of stressful situations and traumatic events or enable them to evaluate stressful events as less threatening [38]. So, in interpreting the results, it can be said that workload of nurses has increased in the COVID-19 pandemic era, and perceived social support reduces the negative effect of workload on quality of life by moderating stress and increasing individual performance.…”