1994
DOI: 10.1016/0149-2063(94)90004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of environment and technology on managerial roles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…). Higher technical complexity requires firms to possess a greater array of knowledge to successfully compete in the industry (Gibbs ). Under such conditions, firms need to invest additional resources to facilitate the flow of information among members of the supply chain required for the achievement of supply chain fit.…”
Section: Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Higher technical complexity requires firms to possess a greater array of knowledge to successfully compete in the industry (Gibbs ). Under such conditions, firms need to invest additional resources to facilitate the flow of information among members of the supply chain required for the achievement of supply chain fit.…”
Section: Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less research has been conducted regarding the situational and environmental variables, but there is one study of direct interest to the work documented in this report. Gibbs (1994) organized Mintzberg's environmental variables in terms of two constructs: complexity (the number of elements in which managerial interaction is required) and dynamism (the rate of change between these elements). Combinations of these variables produced a 2 x 2 matrix (stable-simple, stable-complex, dynamic-simple, dynamic-complex) that allowed Gibbs to test for both direct and indirect effects.…”
Section: Considerable Debate Exists Over the Question Of What Domestimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decisional role includes four roles relating to the organization's important actions: ‘entrepreneur’ (being an initiator and designer of much of the controlled change in the organization); ‘disturbance handler’ (handling important, unexpected disturbances that the organization faces); ‘resource allocator’ (allocating organizational resources of all kinds for significant organizational decisions); and ‘negotiator’ (participating in important negotiation sessions). The replicating studies have provided some support for Mintzberg's () model (e.g., Pavett and Lau, , ; Martinko and Gardner, ), and it has been used as an important source of reference that has informed management research and education (Gibbs, ; Tengblad, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%