2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of environmental policies on the abatement investment decisions of a green firm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lin and Huang (2011) demonstrated that the theory of Tobin's q and real options can be usefully employed to evaluate the feasibility of investing in energy-saving equipment. Saltari and Travaglini (2011) emphasized that, with irreversible capital and pollution uncertainty, the value of a firm captures the option value of the costly technology for disinvesting. Both these papers provide a new flexible thinking for decision making criteria in environmental issues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin and Huang (2011) demonstrated that the theory of Tobin's q and real options can be usefully employed to evaluate the feasibility of investing in energy-saving equipment. Saltari and Travaglini (2011) emphasized that, with irreversible capital and pollution uncertainty, the value of a firm captures the option value of the costly technology for disinvesting. Both these papers provide a new flexible thinking for decision making criteria in environmental issues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider a multinational economy, which is comprised of two regions. Following Saltari et al [11] , the output ( ) of region ( = 1, 2) at time ( ∈ [0, +∞)) is a function of emissions ( ). That is,…”
Section: The Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (12) indicates that, under noncooperation, optimal pollution tax rate ( 1 or 2 ) may depend on the regional pollutant ( 1 1 or 2 2 ) which is caused by the firms in home, but the regional pollutant ( 2 1 or 1 2 ) which is caused by the firms in neighbor may have no effect on optimal pollution tax rate. In addition, the optimal abatement effort of the region does not depend on the damage from the regional pollutant at home ( 1 1 or 2 2 ); this is because the abatement effort of the nation can only affect pollution stock and cannot affect current pollution.…”
Section: Proposition 2 the Government 'S Payoff Duringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) We present a stochastic differential game model of transboundary industrial pollution in which uncertain pollution stock dynamics are taken into account. It is because that uncertain pollution stock dynamics is frequent [2,[11][12][13]; actually many factors like unexpected changes in abatement technologies, the unexpected changes of decay rate of the pollutants, and so forth may incur uncertain pollution stock dynamics. (ii) We extend the model set by Huang et al [10] from finite-horizon level to infinite-horizon level; this is because, in many situations, the terminal time of the game, , is either very far in the future or unknown to the players.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%