2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2022.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of epistasis and linkage on the invasion of locally beneficial mutations and the evolution of genomic islands

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the most significant result of our analysis is that the strength of selection for dominance and epistasis modifiers is relatively stronger than that for recombination modifiers. This is in contrast to situations where locally adapted alleles are not yet established, linkage between the modifier and existing adaptation loci is important [ 27 ]. We further found that modifiers of dominance spread fastest when they are unlinked to the locus they modify, but are linked to another locus that also contributes to local adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Perhaps the most significant result of our analysis is that the strength of selection for dominance and epistasis modifiers is relatively stronger than that for recombination modifiers. This is in contrast to situations where locally adapted alleles are not yet established, linkage between the modifier and existing adaptation loci is important [ 27 ]. We further found that modifiers of dominance spread fastest when they are unlinked to the locus they modify, but are linked to another locus that also contributes to local adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when there is dispersal between demes facing different environmental conditions, migration-selection balance can lead to the long-term maintenance of heterozygotes and result in selection for dominance modifiers [ 37 ]. Understanding selection on modifiers of epistasis is complex, depending on the sign of linkage disequilibrium between deleterious alleles being purged or beneficial alleles being favored with the mutant modifier alleles, as well as on the dominance interactions at each locus [ 27 , 39 ]. We do know, however, that in general an epistatic modifier affecting the total fitness load of a structured population is expected to be strongly selected relative to modifiers affecting only specific loci [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effects of multilocus (non-epistatic) selection have been studied extensively in the context of populations along a geographic cline. Theory demonstrates that closely linked locally selected alleles can strongly reshape their expected frequencies across geographic clines (e.g., [11][12][13]), and fixation probabilities in a continent-island model (e.g., [14][15][16][17]). More generally, linkage among selected alleles can generate dynamics in clines that include combinations of loci involved in complex selection (e.g., [18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of multilocus selection have been studied extensively in the context of populations along a geographic cline. Theory demonstrates that closely linked locally selected alleles can strongly reshape their expected frequencies across geographic clines (e.g., [11][12][13]), and fixation probabilities in a continent-island model (e.g., [14][15][16][17]). More generally, linkage among selected alleles can generate complex dynamics in clines that include combinations of loci involved in complex selection (e.g., [18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%