2016
DOI: 10.1111/fire.12106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Executive, Firm, and Board Characteristics on Executive Exit

Abstract: We estimate a hazard model of the probability of top corporate executives exiting their firms over the period 1996–2010. Our main findings are that: (1) female executives have greater likelihoods of exit than males, (2) the likelihood of exit increases with the independence of the board and decreases with the fraction of the board that is female and the average age of board members, and (3) a higher percentage of independent directors on the board lowers the probability of exit more for females than for males.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 2004 and 2013, almost 35% of all incoming women CEOs in the largest 2500 public firms were outsiders. Nevertheless, most research on the gender gap has focused on internal promotion and firms' turnover practices (Becker‐Blease et al, 2010, 2016; Bertrand & Hallock, 2001; Cohen et al, 1998; Dezső et al, 2016; Smith et al, 2013). In addition, some studies found that women executives may not be as disadvantaged and may enjoy a “female premium” in the upper ranks of management (Hill et al, 2015; Leslie et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Between 2004 and 2013, almost 35% of all incoming women CEOs in the largest 2500 public firms were outsiders. Nevertheless, most research on the gender gap has focused on internal promotion and firms' turnover practices (Becker‐Blease et al, 2010, 2016; Bertrand & Hallock, 2001; Cohen et al, 1998; Dezső et al, 2016; Smith et al, 2013). In addition, some studies found that women executives may not be as disadvantaged and may enjoy a “female premium” in the upper ranks of management (Hill et al, 2015; Leslie et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the very small number of women executives in these firms, these studies accounted for only around 100 women executives (e.g., Bonet et al, 2020; Cook & Glass, 2014; Dezső et al, 2016; Gayle et al, 2012; Helfat et al, 2006). Because of such limited data, most research in this area has focused on internal barriers to promotion rather than on the gender gap in external labor markets (Becker‐Blease et al, 2010, 2016; Bertrand & Hallock, 2001; Bonet et al, 2020; Cohen et al, 1998; Dezső et al, 2016; Smith et al, 2013). Using a comprehensive dataset of women executives allows me to track internal and external promotions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the literature on this topic confirms that the random external effects model (?) may be better for creating dependences [59]. Graphical data analysis does not eliminate heteroscedasticity unambiguously, therefore we conducted the Breusch-Pagan and White tests.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%