1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00268-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of experimental parameters and calibration on MTDSC data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, nonhermatically sealed pans with a pinhole in the lid were used; for the non-anhydrous samples, these pans showed a continuous loss of water. This experimental protocol is in agreement with studies done by McPhillips et al 16,17 The sample size used was between 0.015 and 0.020 g; in this range, no in¯uence of sample size was observed.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, nonhermatically sealed pans with a pinhole in the lid were used; for the non-anhydrous samples, these pans showed a continuous loss of water. This experimental protocol is in agreement with studies done by McPhillips et al 16,17 The sample size used was between 0.015 and 0.020 g; in this range, no in¯uence of sample size was observed.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The instrument was calibrated in the modulated mode for heat capacity using sapphire. A modified procedure of calibration was used according to Hill et al [40]. The suitability of the calibration and the experimental conditions were checked by comparison to the literature values of dry crystalline sucrose [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modulated temperature DSC is an excellent technique for rapidly measuring heat capacities of small samples. However, several experimental conditions including modulation parameters, pan‐type, purge gas, and calibration procedure must be considered to avoid erroneous results 21. Helium is usually preferred, because of its greater thermal conductivity and consequently its ability to permit aggressive temperature modulation;21–23 however, the high thermal conductivity of helium causes the cell constant to be very sensitive to changes in gas flow rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several experimental conditions including modulation parameters, pan‐type, purge gas, and calibration procedure must be considered to avoid erroneous results 21. Helium is usually preferred, because of its greater thermal conductivity and consequently its ability to permit aggressive temperature modulation;21–23 however, the high thermal conductivity of helium causes the cell constant to be very sensitive to changes in gas flow rate. Because the flow rate cannot be controlled adequately with standard flow meters, and because aggressive modulation was not required for the heat capacity measurements, nitrogen (50 mL/min) was found to be superior to helium as a purge gas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%