2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00248.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Family Therapies for Adolescent Delinquency and Substance Abuse: A Meta‐analysis

Abstract: This meta-analysis summarizes results from k = 24 studies comparing either Brief Strategic Family Therapy, Functional Family Therapy, Multidimensional Family Therapy, or Multisystemic Therapy to either treatment-as-usual, an alternative therapy, or a control group in the treatment of adolescent substance abuse and delinquency. Additionally, the authors reviewed and applied three advanced meta-analysis methods including influence analysis, multivariate meta-analysis, and publication bias analyses. The results s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
187
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
13
187
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the effect was small [55], this can still translate into cost savings and important benefits to youth and their families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the effect was small [55], this can still translate into cost savings and important benefits to youth and their families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baldwin, Christian, Berkeljon, Shadish, and Bean (2012) reviewed 24 FBT studies that targeted ASU, delinquency, or both. Four FBT models were sampled: BSFT, FFT, MDFT, and MST.…”
Section: Meta-analytic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their mean effect size of systemic interventions did not differ from the effects of other family therapies. Other meta-analyses assessed only single systemic approaches or effects on an individual mental disorder (e.g., Baldwin, Christian, Berkeljon, Shadish, & Bean, 2012;Curtis, Ronan, & Borduin, 2004). Even though some authors claimed and tried to prove the efficacy of systemic therapy (see, e.g., , the effects of some forms of systemic therapy have not yet been evaluated in randomized, controlled trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%