2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Feedback on Adherence to Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of RCTs

Abstract: Feedback guided by objective or subjective measures of adherence improves adherence and, perhaps more importantly, prevents worsening of adherence over time even when only small absolute improvements in adherence were noted. Increased use of feedback to improve treatment adherence has the potential to reduce avoidable healthcare costs caused by non-adherence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeated educational messages (spaced learning) have been shown to be an effective strategy for memories that “stick” [ 75 ] This implies the benefit to having periodic “refresher” sessions with gout patients to remind them of the rationale for their long-term use of ULT and other key self-management points. Feedback, where patients receive individualized information based on their knowledge deficits or specific questions, has been shown to improve adherence to medications [ 76 ]. This supports potential benefit of interactive knowledge questionnaires with feedback on responses, and online programs which provide education informed by individual details entered by the patient.…”
Section: Opportunities and Timing Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeated educational messages (spaced learning) have been shown to be an effective strategy for memories that “stick” [ 75 ] This implies the benefit to having periodic “refresher” sessions with gout patients to remind them of the rationale for their long-term use of ULT and other key self-management points. Feedback, where patients receive individualized information based on their knowledge deficits or specific questions, has been shown to improve adherence to medications [ 76 ]. This supports potential benefit of interactive knowledge questionnaires with feedback on responses, and online programs which provide education informed by individual details entered by the patient.…”
Section: Opportunities and Timing Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After completion of the VOICE trial, a subset of women on the active arms received retrospective feedback about their drug levels during the trial, which they reported to be useful and suggested that real-time drug level monitoring and feedback would promote honest discussions about PrEP use [ 11 ]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reported that feedback, based on subjective or objective measures of adherence, increased adherence by 10% [ 12 ]. Plasma tenofovir monitoring among men who have sex with men (MSM) in a United States demonstration project was used to trigger more intensive counseling support among those who had undetectable plasma tenofovir levels, reflecting no PrEP use in the prior week, and was associated with sustained improved PrEP adherence in 50% [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McLean et al [125], argue identifying new strategies to enhance adherence needs to be improved through a greater understanding of the patient and professional and organisational factors responsible for poor adherence. The systematic review by Seawoodharry et al [127], determining the effect of feedback on adherence aligns with McLean et al [125], concluding the need to understand the patient's view of their need for treatment, their expectations and concerns was key in addressing adherence. They concede there is no intervention capable of addressing non-adherence in all patients raising challenges for tackling non-attendance in my service [127].…”
Section: Key Fi Ndingsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The systematic review by Seawoodharry et al [127], determining the effect of feedback on adherence aligns with McLean et al [125], concluding the need to understand the patient's view of their need for treatment, their expectations and concerns was key in addressing adherence. They concede there is no intervention capable of addressing non-adherence in all patients raising challenges for tackling non-attendance in my service [127]. shows adherence strategies to be problematic these components may have been benefi cial in improving treatment outcomes and attendance [118,128].…”
Section: Key Fi Ndingsmentioning
confidence: 73%