The Effects of Fertilization and Time of Cutting on Regeneration and Seed Production ofDipsacus laciniatus(Dipsacacae)

Dudley, M. P.; Parrish, J. A. D.; Post, Susan L.; Helm, C. G.; Wiedenmann, Robert N.

doi:10.3375/043.029.0206

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Cutting before herbicide application did not alter the effects of herbicides on the number of seedlings, seeds, or the biomass of rosettes and non-target plants, and therefore it is not useful to mow before herbicide application. Previous studies have found that mowing may actually increase seed production and facilitate dispersal, and that the best time for mowing is in early July after bolting but before flowers develop [14]. A combination of herbicide application in April along with cutting D. laciniatus once in early July would further reduce the number of seeds produced and thus help reclaim natural areas.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We separated the plants into bolting stems, rosettes, and non-target plants, and also counted the number of seedlings per plot. We estimated the number of seeds produced by each bolting head using the previously determined equation 22.201X + 14.407, where X is the length of the bolting head [14]. Rosettes and non-target plants were dried and then weighed.…”

Section: Harvestmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Effects of Herbicide Treatment, Life History Stage, and Application Date on Cut and Uncut Teasel, Dipsacus laciniatus (Dipsacacae)

Zimmerman¹,

Porter²,

Riney³

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cutleaf teasel (Dipsacus laciniatus L.) is an invasive plant that is spreading through natural and disturbed areas. Teasel grows for two or more years as a rosette which stays green late in the growing season and begins growth earlier in spring than its native competitors. The purpose of this study was to find a time both seasonally and in cutleaf teasel's life history when herbicides could be applied to decrease teasel with the least impact on the surrounding vegetation. We tested the effects of three different herbicides (glyphosate (Round-Up TM), triclopyr amine (Garlon TM), and clopyralid (Lontrel TM)) on cut and uncut teasel at three different times of the year (July and October 2005, and April 2006) near Clinton Lake in Dewitt Co. Illinois. Photosynthetic measurements were taken before application to determine teasel's susceptibility to the herbicides, and we harvested seed heads and rosettes in late October 2006. Results indicated teasel was photosynthetically active at all three application times. Cutting before herbicide application had no significant effect on the number of seeds produced or the dry weight of the rosettes. Herbicide treatment in April significantly reduced the amount of seeds produced, but there were no significant differences among the three herbicides. Clopyralid application in April significantly reduced rosette biomass, but none of the herbicides significantly affected rosette biomass at the other two times. Our studies suggest herbicide application early in the growing season may be beneficial in controlling the spread of teasel, and that mowing at the time of spraying will not increase effectiveness of the herbicide.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Harvestmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Herbicide Treatment, Life History Stage, and Application Date on Cut and Uncut Teasel, Dipsacus laciniatus (Dipsacacae)

Zimmerman¹,

Porter²,

Riney³

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It was used as such since Roman times and was a popular crop in England in the 14th century (Topham 1968) until more recently, when cultivation moved to France, Spain, and Italy. Dipsacus sativus may have been introduced to North America as early as the 1700s (Donaldson and Rafferty 2002), with reports of cultivation in New York (1840) and Oregon (1907), USA (Dallimore 1912); and it was still under cultivation in California in the mid-20th century (Rector et al, 2006;Stoner 1951). Dipsacus fullonum and D. laciniatus do not have receptacles suitable for raising nap on cloth, but D. fullonum is commonly named Fuller's teasel (a fuller is a person who works with cloth).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All three species have a diploid chromosome number of 2 n = 18 (Temsch and Greilhuber 2010). Control of teasels is currently limited to mowing, herbicide applications, and revegetation (Bentivegna and Smeda 2012; Daddario et al 2021; Dudley et al 2009); an investigation into biological control (Rector et al 2006) was initiated but is currently not progressing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Population structure of three invasive congeneric teasel (Dipsacus) species

Gaskin,

West,

Rector

2024

Invasive plant sci. manag.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three species of the Old World genus Dipsacus L. are considered invasive in the Americas, yet they may differ in how they spread, reproduce, and in genetic diversity. Differences in invasion method may suggest that different management techniques are needed for each species. We performed genetic analyses on 572 plants in 69 populations from the USA, Argentina, and Eurasia with the goals of analyzing taxonomy, diversity, mode of reproduction, population structure and founder effect of each of these species’ invasions, as well as looking for evidence of recent or ongoing hybridization. We found D. sativus to be lowest in diversity and possibly relying on self-pollination more than the other species, D. fullonum and D. laciniatus. We found no evidence of hybridization within the invasions and no support for D. sativus as a subspecies of D. fullonum. The closest genetic matches of D. fullonum from USA to the native range were with Hungary and Spain, while the closest match for D. fullonum between Argentina and the native range was with Spain. Dipsacus laciniatus from the USA most closely matched with samples from Russia. Population structure information regarding these three weedy Dipsacus species can help us understand their invasive processes as well as give insight into their management and the development of a biological control program.

show abstract

“…Regeneration of flowers and inflorescences can be easily observed in alien plants growing in anthropogenic (i.e., arable fields with cereals, lawns, roadsides, railway embankments, and flood banks) and semi-natural (meadows and grasslands) habitats, where the plant cover is subjected to the cutting. On the other hand, regular cutting (mowing or shredding) has been recommended to control many invasive plants (e.g., Pyšek et al 2007;Bohren et al 2008;Dudley et al 2009;Simard and Benoit 2011;Tokarska-Guzik et al 2011;Končeková et al 2015;Monty et al 2015;Lommen et al 2018 and references therein). It is known that regeneration capability depends on the height, the timing and frequency of the cutting.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Synflorescence regeneration after cutting in Solidago ×niederederi (Asteraceae), a hybrid between invasive S. canadensis and native S. virgaurea

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solidago ×niederederi, a natural hybrid between invasive S. canadensis and native S. virgaurea, is considered as naturalized alien taxon in Europe. In this study, we conducted a field experiment on the regeneration ability of S. ×niederederi after cutting off its synflorescences (panicles with capitula). The regeneration of synflorescences occurred in 79.6% of the examined shoots (ramets) of the hybrid. After regeneration shoots were significantly shorter and formed shorter, narrower and less branched synflorescences. Moreover, the number of capitula was significantly lower after regeneration as well as number of disc flowers and pollen viability. The obtained results suggest that the hybrid has a high ability of synflorescence regeneration after cutting and one-time cutting at high level during flowering is not effective method to control the hybrid in the wild.

show abstract

The Effects of Fertilization and Time of Cutting on Regeneration and Seed Production ofDipsacus laciniatus(Dipsacacae)

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

The Effects of Herbicide Treatment, Life History Stage, and Application Date on Cut and Uncut Teasel, <i>Dipsacus laciniatus</i> (Dipsacacae)

The Effects of Herbicide Treatment, Life History Stage, and Application Date on Cut and Uncut Teasel, <i>Dipsacus laciniatus</i> (Dipsacacae)

Population structure of three invasive congeneric teasel (Dipsacus) species

Synflorescence regeneration after cutting in Solidago ×niederederi (Asteraceae), a hybrid between invasive S. canadensis and native S. virgaurea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

The Effects of Fertilization and Time of Cutting on Regeneration and Seed Production ofDipsacus laciniatus(Dipsacacae)

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

The Effects of Herbicide Treatment, Life History Stage, and Application Date on Cut and Uncut Teasel, &lt;i&gt;Dipsacus laciniatus&lt;/i&gt; (Dipsacacae)

The Effects of Herbicide Treatment, Life History Stage, and Application Date on Cut and Uncut Teasel, &lt;i&gt;Dipsacus laciniatus&lt;/i&gt; (Dipsacacae)

Population structure of three invasive congeneric teasel (Dipsacus) species

Synflorescence regeneration after cutting in Solidago ×niederederi (Asteraceae), a hybrid between invasive S. canadensis and native S. virgaurea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

The Effects of Herbicide Treatment, Life History Stage, and Application Date on Cut and Uncut Teasel, <i>Dipsacus laciniatus</i> (Dipsacacae)

The Effects of Herbicide Treatment, Life History Stage, and Application Date on Cut and Uncut Teasel, <i>Dipsacus laciniatus</i> (Dipsacacae)