The effects of flumazenil, Ro 15-4513 and β-CCM on the behaviour of control and stressed mice in the staircase test

Abstract

The effects of flumazenil, Ro 154513 and beta-CCM in the staircase test were studied in control and small platform (SP) stressed mice. SP stress was induced by placing mice on small platforms (3.5 cm in diameter) surrounded by water for 24 h. This model contains several factors of stress, such as rapid eye movement sleep deprivation, isolation, immobilization and falling into the water. The staircase test consisted of placing a mouse in an enclosed staircase with five steps and recording: (i) the number of rearings and (ii) steps made during 3 min. SP stress increased the exploratory activity of mice in the staircase test as demonstrated by an increase in the number of rearings and steps made. In control mice flumazenil (2.0 and 10.0 mg/kg), Ro 15-4513 (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg) and beta-CCM (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) exerted an anxiogenic effect that was demonstrated by an increase in the number of rearings without significant changes in the number of steps. Similar to control mice, flumazenil induced an anxiogenic effect in SP stressed mice as demonstrated by an increase in the number of rearings. However, the sedative effect of flumazenil as demonstrated by a decrease in the number of steps made was more pronounced in SP stressed mice. In the SP stressed mice, the anxiogenic effect of Ro 15-4513 and beta-CCM was masked by their strong sedative effect and a decrease in both measures of exploratory activity (number of rearings and number of steps). These data suggest that SP stress induces hypersensitivity to the sedative effect of flumazenil, Ro 15-4513 and beta-CCM in the staircase test.

Pharmacological Alterations of Anxious Behaviour in Mice Depending on Both Strain and the Behavioural Situation

“…Yet flumazenil has also been described as an anxiogenic agent for testing in the elevated plus-maze [66], [67], the social interaction model [68], [69] and the mouse defence test battery [58], [70]; it has been shown to produce an inverse agonist-like promnesic effect in a learning task [71]. In some cases it has even been described as agonistic [72], [73]; e.g.…”

Bidirectional effects of benzodiazepine binding site ligands on active avoidance acquisition and retention: differential antagonism by flumazenil and β-CCt

“…However, in a number of animal models of anxiety (reviewed in File and Pellow 1986) and memory (reviewed in Chapouthier and Venault 2002), inconsistency of flumazenil effects was observed: sometimes higher doses of flumazenil were associated with anxiogenic activities (Lee and Rodgers 1991;Da Cunha et al 1992;Pokk and Zharkovsky 1997;Savic et al 2004), and lower to moderate doses with memory-enhancing actions (Lal et al 1988;Raffalli-Sebille and Chapouthier 1991;Herzog et al 1996). The immediate post-training intracerebral injection of flumazenil enhanced retention of habituation as well as passive avoidance performance in rats (Wolfman et al 1991), suggesting that flumazenil might affect retention of stressful behaviors through blockade of effects of putative endogenous benzodiazepine-like ligands released during training .…”

Effects of two acute stressors on the anxiolytic efficacy of chlordiazepoxide

“…However, the anxiogenic effects of stress were not always present (Pokk and Zharkovsky 1997), and it was also suggested (Berton et al 1997) that the anxiogenic effects of social stressors are not always apparent in nonsocial settings. In our experiment, neither novelty exposure nor defeat induced significant changes in plusmaze behavior immediately after the stressor.…”