2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of fluoropolymers with optimized contents on reactivity and combustion behavior of Al/MxOy nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study reveals that the P m for AC and PA are the lowest and highest, measured at 1.85 and 3.94·MPa·g –1 , respectively. Compared to μ-Al/CuO under the same conditions (1.40 MPa·g –1 ), it suggests that the use of n -Al particles can considerably enhance the reactivity and impact performance, albeit at a slightly higher cost in energy. However, the values of P r for AC and PA are quite similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The study reveals that the P m for AC and PA are the lowest and highest, measured at 1.85 and 3.94·MPa·g –1 , respectively. Compared to μ-Al/CuO under the same conditions (1.40 MPa·g –1 ), it suggests that the use of n -Al particles can considerably enhance the reactivity and impact performance, albeit at a slightly higher cost in energy. However, the values of P r for AC and PA are quite similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More comprehensive data and their respective densities are included in the support materials. Due to the noncombustibility of PC, it was tested solely in TG/DSC and GC-MS. For AC, as an impressive thermite, it boasts a high density and volumetric calorific value, measured 3031 J·g –1 and 12.73 kJ·cm –3 , which is lower than the μ-Al/CuO of 3184 J·g –1 and 15.79 kJ·cm –3 due to the sticker oxide layer. On the other hand, AP is known for its high gravimetric calorific value, which reaches 4032 J·g –1 , but its low-density results in a lower volumetric calorific value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations