2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of government borrowing on corporate financing: Evidence from Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This theory means that the unsustainable and unclear in macroscopic policies can adversely trigger consequences such as higher inflation, or an increase of the interest rate in capital markets and vice versa. In brief, this phenomenon will be considered as a 'crowd out effect' of private sector borrowing as the study of Terjesen et al (2016), Ayturk (2017). In addition, we also refer to Miller (1977) and Myers (1984) about the theoretical framework in two aspects (i) debt and taxes (ii) capital structure in corporates.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory means that the unsustainable and unclear in macroscopic policies can adversely trigger consequences such as higher inflation, or an increase of the interest rate in capital markets and vice versa. In brief, this phenomenon will be considered as a 'crowd out effect' of private sector borrowing as the study of Terjesen et al (2016), Ayturk (2017). In addition, we also refer to Miller (1977) and Myers (1984) about the theoretical framework in two aspects (i) debt and taxes (ii) capital structure in corporates.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory means that the unsustainable and unclear in macroscopic policies can adversely trigger consequences such as higher inflation, or an increase of the interest rate in capital markets and vice versa. In brief, this phenomenon will be considered as a 'crowd out effect' of private sector borrowing as the study of Terjesen et al (2016), Ayturk (2017). In addition, we also refer to Miller (1977) and Myers (1984) about the theoretical framework in two aspects (i) debt and taxes (ii) capital structure in corporates.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the tax and non-tax revenue fall short in financing government's spending programme, the government announces an annual borrowing programme in the Budget. As stated by Ayturk (2017), bulk of government's fiscal deficit comes from its interest obligation on past debt. If the government resorts to larger borrowings, more than what it has projected, then its interest costs also go up risking higher fiscal deficit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%