2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2013.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of head movement and walking speed on gait parameters in patients with chronic neck pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Associations between IOMNP and breathing dysfunction [59], worse performance in over-head reaching tasks [60] and alterations in gait kinematics [61] were also found.…”
Section: Complex Functionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Associations between IOMNP and breathing dysfunction [59], worse performance in over-head reaching tasks [60] and alterations in gait kinematics [61] were also found.…”
Section: Complex Functionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Finally, we point up adverse effects of IOMNP on complex functions not so closely related to the cervical region: breathing dysfunction [59], shoulder girdle disorders [60,66], and alterations in gait kinematics [61]. pain, was also found in upper trapezius during upper limb movements [56].…”
Section: Muscular Endurancementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Considering that her main reason for seeking care was a distinctly asymmetrical problem, it's important to note the greater symmetry seen in the post-1 and post-2 assessments for hip flexion and extension, loading and pre-swing periods during stance phase, and timing of the peak 1 and peak 2 force events. The participant's increased self-selected walking speed in itself reflects improvement; slower walking speeds can be associated with pain 17,[39][40][41] or decreased strength or flexibility. 40 The post-care values of shorter double support times and longer steps, and the time changes of stance and swing phases, suggest an increased ability to function when on only 1 support limb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be argued that dynamic measures of balance may be more relevant and sensitive than static measures because these tests incorporate context-specific tasks that may be similar to activities of daily living (Herman et al, 2009;Podsiadlo & Richardson, 1991b). To my knowledge, only three studies have reported dynamic balance performance in older adults with NP, specifically various spatiotemporal parameters of gait such as stride length and cadence (Poole et al, 2008;Uthaikhup et al, 2014), step length and step width, with and without head turns (Poole et al, 2008;Uthaikhup et al, 2012;Uthaikhup et al, 2014) and the step test (Poole et al, 2008). Two out of these three studies (Poole et al, 2008;Uthaikhup et al, 2012) measured gait with and without head turns and the third study (Uthaikhup et al, 2014) measured gait without head turns, all at a self-selected speed over 10 metres.…”
Section: Dynamic Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To my knowledge, only three studies have reported dynamic balance performance in older adults with NP, specifically various spatiotemporal parameters of gait such as stride length and cadence (Poole et al, 2008;Uthaikhup et al, 2014), step length and step width, with and without head turns (Poole et al, 2008;Uthaikhup et al, 2012;Uthaikhup et al, 2014) and the step test (Poole et al, 2008). Two out of these three studies (Poole et al, 2008;Uthaikhup et al, 2012) measured gait with and without head turns and the third study (Uthaikhup et al, 2014) measured gait without head turns, all at a self-selected speed over 10 metres. These studies reported conflicting results when comparing these gait parameters in older adults with NP to healthy controls: Poole et al (2008) reported slower gait speed and reduced cadence with head turns, while Uthaikup et al (2012; showed no differences in these measures but significant differences in the number of steps recorded within 15 seconds during the step test (Uthaikhup et al, 2012).…”
Section: Dynamic Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%