The Effects of High Intensity Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Abdominal Strength and Endurance, Core Strength, Abdominal Girth, and Perceived Body Shape and Satisfaction

Porcari, John P.; Ryskey, Abigail; Foster, Carl

doi:10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.6n.1p.19

Cited by 13 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Secondary study end points were abdominal circumference as assessed by 3D imaging and assessment of contour changes using a Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS). A subject Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ), previously used in neuromuscular electrical stimulation body contouring studies, 31 , 32 was administered to assess how subjects perceived the shape and appearance of their abdomens. A set of 10 dichotomous word pairs was presented with a selection of 5 checkboxes to assess how the subject described the appearance of their stomach at the present time (e.g., flat vs rounded, weak vs strong, hard vs soft).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND In addition to reducing subcutaneous fat for body contouring, some patients are interested in toning the underlying muscle layer. OBJECTIVE This feasibility study evaluated the safety and efficacy of electromagnetic muscle stimulation (EMMS) alone, cryolipolysis alone, and cryolipolysis with EMMS for noninvasive contouring of abdomen. METHODS Abdomens of 50 subjects were treated in a study with 3 cohorts: EMMS alone, Cryolipolysis alone, and Cryolipolysis + EMMS in combination. Electromagnetic muscle stimulation treatments were delivered in 4 sessions over 2 weeks. Cryolipolysis treatments were delivered in one session. Combination treatments consisted of one cryolipolysis and 4 EMMS visits. Efficacy was assessed by independent physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), circumferential measurement, Subject GAIS (SGAIS), and Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ). RESULTS Safety was demonstrated for all study cohorts with no device- or procedure-related adverse events. Independent photo review showed greatest mean GAIS score for the Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, then EMMS only cohort. BSQ showed greatest average score increase for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only cohort, then EMMS only cohort. Mean circumferential reduction measurements were greatest for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, and then EMMS only cohort. The mean SGAIS improvement score was equal for the Cryolipolysis only and Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohorts, followed by the EMMS only cohort. CONCLUSION A multimodal approach using cryolipolysis and EMMS was safe and demonstrated enhanced body contouring efficacy for this feasibility study.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in the participants' feelings about body shape assessed using a Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ) specific to abdomen and buttocks at baseline, immediately post final treatment, 4 weeks post final treatment (primary endpoint), and 12 weeks post final treatment. The BSQ, an assessment tool previously used in neuromuscular electrical stimulation body contouring studies, consists of 10 dichotomous word pairs presented with an option to assess body shape and appearance (e.g., flat vs. rounded, weak vs. strong, and attractive vs. unattractive) using a 5-point semantic differential scale 1 (most negative) to 5 (most positive) [14,18,19]. The cumulative score ranges between 10 and 50 based on the numerical response to each item.…”

Section: Study Assessmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A 12‐Week, Prospective, Non‐Comparative, Non‐Randomized Study of Magnetic Muscle Stimulation for Improvement of Body Satisfaction With the Abdomen and Buttocks

Fabi

Dover

Tanzi³

et al. 2020

Lasers Surg Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objective Magnetic muscle stimulation (MMS) is a relatively new energy‐based technology that provides a non‐invasive option for body contouring through stimulation and toning of underlying skeletal muscles. This study was conducted to examine the safety, efficacy, and body satisfaction scores of MMS using a CoolToneTM prototype for the aesthetic improvement of abdominal and buttock contour. Study Design/Materials and Methods This was a prospective, non‐comparative, non‐randomized, 12‐week, multicenter study. Male and female participants aged 22‐65 years received 4 MMS treatment sessions to the abdomen and/or buttocks. Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ) scores for abdomen and/or buttocks were assessed at baseline, immediately post final treatment, at 4 weeks (primary endpoint), and 12 weeks post final treatment. Subject‐rated Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) was assessed at 4 weeks post final treatment (secondary endpoint), and 12 weeks post final treatment. Additional efficacy assessment included abdominal circumference obtained by 3D imaging at baseline, immediately post final treatment, and at 4 and 12 weeks post final treatment. A Subject Experience Questionnaire (SEQ) was used to assess treatment satisfaction and perspectives at 4 weeks and 12 weeks post final treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Results A total of 110 participants were recruited, who were 75% female, 80% Caucasian (mostly non‐Hispanic), average age of 39.5 years (range 22–59) with an average body mass index (BMI) of 23.3 kg/m2 (range 18–29.9). At the 4‐week post final treatment visit, the average BSQ score for participants receiving abdominal treatment (n = 93) was significantly improved with a 5.1 average increase in total score from baseline (possible score range 10–50) and by a 5.5 average increase from baseline for participants receiving buttocks treatment (n = 32) (p < 0.05). At 4 weeks post final treatment, the proportion of participants with SGAIS scores >“Improved” was 68.1% for participants receiving treatment of the abdomen (n = 94), and 81.8% for those receiving buttocks treatment (n = 33). The mean total decrease from baseline in waist circumference was significant at all time points. At the 12‐week post final treatment visit, SEQ data revealed that a majority of participants were “Satisfied” or “Very Satisfied” with overall treatment results and “Agreed” or “Strongly Agreed” that they were motivated to maintain results either by working out or by additional treatment. A total of 6 AEs related to the device and/or treatment were reported, which resolved spontaneously during the study. Conclusion Treatment of the abdomen and/or buttocks with MMS was well‐tolerated and demonstrated significant improvement in aesthetic appearance through the 12‐week post final treatment study duration. As a stand‐alone treatment, MMS expands the range of options for individualized treatment planning for patients seeking abdominal and/or gluteal muscle toning. © 2020 The Authors. Lasers in S...

show abstract

“…The PEA is an assessment tool used in previous neuromuscular electrical stimulation device studies. 19 Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test to determine whether there were differences between the groups. Two group comparisons were made using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test.…”

Section: Dynamic Abdominal Muscle Endurancementioning

confidence: 99%

Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Abdominal and Quadriceps Muscle Strengthening: A Randomized Controlled Trial

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Radiographic imaging has demonstrated muscle hypertrophy after treatment with noninvasive body contouring devices that target skeletal muscles. OBJECTIVE This pilot study sought to evaluate whether increased muscle mass translated to improved functional strength and endurance. METHODS A prospective, single-center, randomized open-label controlled study included 26 subjects randomized into 3 groups: 2 treatment groups and 1 control group. Both treatment groups received 4 neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) treatments over a 2-week period. Muscle performance testing was conducted at baseline and 2-week and 4-week posttreatment. Anthropometric measurements were assessed at baseline and at 4-week posttreatment. Study participants completed subject satisfaction surveys and a personal experience assessment. RESULTS Treatment with NMES resulted in statistically significant improvements in abdominal and quadriceps strength and endurance from baseline through 4-week posttreatment. Mean waist circumference decreased and quadriceps circumference increased, both nonsignificantly. Subject satisfaction regarding abdominal and quadriceps strength was reported as "satisfied or very satisfied" in 89% and 92% at 4-week and 8-week posttreatment, respectively. CONCLUSION Treatment of the abdomen and quadriceps with NMES leads to significant improvements in muscular strength and endurance.

show abstract

The Effects of High Intensity Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Abdominal Strength and Endurance, Core Strength, Abdominal Girth, and Perceived Body Shape and Satisfaction

Cited by 13 publications

References 9 publications

Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring

Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring

A 12‐Week, Prospective, Non‐Comparative, Non‐Randomized Study of Magnetic Muscle Stimulation for Improvement of Body Satisfaction With the Abdomen and Buttocks

Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Abdominal and Quadriceps Muscle Strengthening: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About