2019
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of high‐involvement work systems and shared leadership on team creativity: A multilevel investigation

Abstract: Understanding how to effectively stimulate creative potential in the workplace through strategic human resource management (HRM) practices is critical to enhancing organizational competitiveness. This study investigates the effects of high‐involvement work systems (HIWS) on team creativity in terms of ability–motivation–opportunity theory and a team input–process–output model. It draws on a data set consisting of 668 employees from 112 teams in 41 organizations in China. The results reveal that HIWS are positi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(183 reference statements)
2
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also identified a moderating influence of transformational leadership by a designated team leader. Empirical evidence for a direct positive influence of shared leadership on team creativity was found for undergraduate student teams ( Lee et al, 2015 ; Sun et al, 2016 ), organizational teams ( Ali et al, 2020 ; Cavazotte and de Paula, 2020 ; Song et al, 2020 ), and inter-organizational teams ( Gu et al, 2018 ). Aime et al (2014 , p. 328) confirmed this positive influence on team creativity for the related concept of “power heterarchy” based on a sample of cross-functional student teams, stating that less-hierarchical teams are enabled “to leverage the diverse and unique capabilities of individual members”.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also identified a moderating influence of transformational leadership by a designated team leader. Empirical evidence for a direct positive influence of shared leadership on team creativity was found for undergraduate student teams ( Lee et al, 2015 ; Sun et al, 2016 ), organizational teams ( Ali et al, 2020 ; Cavazotte and de Paula, 2020 ; Song et al, 2020 ), and inter-organizational teams ( Gu et al, 2018 ). Aime et al (2014 , p. 328) confirmed this positive influence on team creativity for the related concept of “power heterarchy” based on a sample of cross-functional student teams, stating that less-hierarchical teams are enabled “to leverage the diverse and unique capabilities of individual members”.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued in the literature that highinvolvement HR practices (staffing, training, compensation, performance appraisal, work design, participation) may encourage employees to take the initiative to address new issues, and to cooperate and achieve organizational goals (Collins & Smith, 2006;Ghoshal & Bartlett, 1994). Song et al (2020) argue that the climate of involvement created by high-involvement HR practices provide employees with power, reward, and knowledge, and hence will encourage them to come up with creative ideas and take initiatives. In addition, Úbeda-García et al (2017) argued that HR flexibility (skill flexibility, behavior flexibility, and practices flexibility) that depends on employees' management practices affects organizations' ability to undertake exploration and exploitation processes simultaneously through encouraging employees to come up with new ideas and generate new knowledge.…”
Section: High-involvement Hr Practices and Employees' Ambidextrous Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that team and unit constitute an important base for stimulating creativity and innovation at individual, team and organizational levels (e.g. Gong et al, 2013a;Song et al, 2020), this is an area that more research attention can be directed to. We can also observe that about one-third of the empirical studies heeded Lepak's call for more multi-level studies in the field of HRM (Lepak et al, 2007).…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%