2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-012-0267-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen reproductive potential on colony growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
92
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
92
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, queen weight is studied as a selection criterion in honeybee breeding programs (Souza et al, 2013) due to high heritability. Rangel et al (2013) observed that a honeybee colony can be evaluated as the extended phenotype of its queen, and thus the selection working mostly at the colony level may be equivalent at the individual level. Tarpy et al (2012) did not notice a correlation between queen body size and mating success.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, queen weight is studied as a selection criterion in honeybee breeding programs (Souza et al, 2013) due to high heritability. Rangel et al (2013) observed that a honeybee colony can be evaluated as the extended phenotype of its queen, and thus the selection working mostly at the colony level may be equivalent at the individual level. Tarpy et al (2012) did not notice a correlation between queen body size and mating success.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this time point, rerouting the phenotypic trajectory from worker to queen is correlated with reduced ovariole number, queen weight and semen storage capacity, all signs of reduced queen fecundity (Rangel et al, 2013;Woyke, 1971). This larvaeenurse bee signalling via larval pheromones thus enables workers to rear bees of the worker phenotype without queen characteristics through restrictive feeding during late larval development (Linksvayer et al, 2011;Page, 2013).…”
Section: Pheromones Regulate Complex Interactions In Insect Societiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The change in pheromone signals of larvae as they mature may have evolved concurrently with the regulated feeding regime imposed by nurse bees on worker larvae. Larvae benefit from a highly proteinaceous diet only during a limited developmental window, which rapidly closes after the third instar (Haydak, 1943(Haydak, , 1970Rangel, Keller, & Tarpy, 2013;Woyke, 1971), as the larvae lose their totipotency and can no longer be shunted into the queen development trajectory. As a direct result of diet, larvae change dramatically in size during larval development, increasing their weight up to 1500-fold during 6 days (Snodgrass, 1925), in large part due to protein synthesis in the fat body.…”
Section: Pheromones Regulate Complex Interactions In Insect Societiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curiously, we found no evidence of either, which is not consistent with earlier studies. Previous studies have suggested that supersedure can occur because the queen is failing due to disease [48,49] or injury [50,51] but not grafting age [52], insemination volume [53], or oviposition rate [54]. Nonetheless, because queen supersedure has become increasingly problematic in commercial beekeeping operations [36][37][38], it remains a high priority to identify the causes of premature supersedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, because queen supersedure has become increasingly problematic in commercial beekeeping operations [36][37][38], it remains a high priority to identify the causes of premature supersedure. Previous studies have reported differences in the chemical composition of the queen mandibular gland [52,[55][56][57][58] and the Dufour's gland [59] based on the queen's reproductive state and insemination quantity, therefore it would be very telling if there were significant differences in queen pheromones between queens raised in miticide-free versus miticideladen beeswax cups, and if so, to what degree workers inside the colony perceive these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%