2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2008.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of host age and superparasitism by the parasitoid, Microplitis rufiventris on the cellular and humoral immune response of Spodoptera littoralis larvae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dissections of larvae showed that the successful encapsulation rate variation measured on adult flies was indeed partly explained by the occurrence of superparasitism. Superparasitized larvae often failed to encapsulate all parasitoids whereas monoparasitized larvae succeeded more frequently, a result that is consistent with earlier studies on other host-parasitoid systems [45], [46]. For instance, in Spodoptera littoralis exposed to superparasitism by Microplitis rufiventris , a decrease in both cellular (encapsulation) and humoral response efficiencies was demonstrated [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Dissections of larvae showed that the successful encapsulation rate variation measured on adult flies was indeed partly explained by the occurrence of superparasitism. Superparasitized larvae often failed to encapsulate all parasitoids whereas monoparasitized larvae succeeded more frequently, a result that is consistent with earlier studies on other host-parasitoid systems [45], [46]. For instance, in Spodoptera littoralis exposed to superparasitism by Microplitis rufiventris , a decrease in both cellular (encapsulation) and humoral response efficiencies was demonstrated [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The dispersal habit of the larger hosts makes them more difÞcult to Þnd by wasp females than smaller females, which tend to aggregate easier to be parasitized. Also, larger hosts have the physiological capacity to kill the parasitoid larvae (Hegazi and Khafagi 2008). Further investigation is required to verify the rate of egg maturation and eventually egg resorption in different life stages of M. rufiventris females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to facilitation, which occurs when infection with one pathogen or parasitoid increases the vulnerability of the host to another pathogen or parasitoid. Competition for host resources due to co-infection may reduce the host immune response [41,42] and parasitoids are known to suppress the immune response of a host, which has been shown to facilitate infection by pathogens, including viruses [43,44]. Thus, C. melanoscela may facilitate LdMNPV by dampening the immune response of the host with the aid of a polydnavirus (though see [45]).…”
Section: Discussion (A) Co-infection Of Gypsy Moth Larvae By Multiplementioning
confidence: 99%