2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01147.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Household Corrosive Chemicals on Human Dentition*

Abstract: There is a gap in the literature concerning the chemical effects that household products may produce on human remains. The present study examines the effects of household chemical products on teeth. A total of eight chemicals were utilized for this experiment. The corrosive chemical categories include: hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, and sodium hydroxide. Two products with each chemical were used, each representing varying concentrations of the corrosive product. Two human teeth were allocat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compact bone consistently proved to be the only tissue allowing STR-based identification of the experimental samples at the most advanced stages of corrosion, regardless of the acid type (2 days for hydrochloric acid and aqua regia, 7 days for nitric acid, and 28 days for sulfuric acid). These time intervals always exceeded those reported for teeth samples in the case of both the molecular assays used in the present research (7 days for sulfuric acid only) and the morphological methods evaluated in previous studies (<24 h for hydrochloric and nitric acid, approximately 4 to 10 days for sulfuric acid) [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compact bone consistently proved to be the only tissue allowing STR-based identification of the experimental samples at the most advanced stages of corrosion, regardless of the acid type (2 days for hydrochloric acid and aqua regia, 7 days for nitric acid, and 28 days for sulfuric acid). These time intervals always exceeded those reported for teeth samples in the case of both the molecular assays used in the present research (7 days for sulfuric acid only) and the morphological methods evaluated in previous studies (<24 h for hydrochloric and nitric acid, approximately 4 to 10 days for sulfuric acid) [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Highly mineralized enamel and dentine constitute an effective physical barrier that protects dental pulp from environmental degrading agents. However, previous studies on isolated teeth have demonstrated [5][6][7][8][9][10] that strong acids (especially hydrochloric and nitric acid) can rapidly erode the enamel and expose the dentine surface. In this respect, the results of our immersion experiments indicated that the mechanical protective effect of alveolar bone on teeth was limited in the case of nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, and aqua regia, and that acid digestion times for whole mandibles/maxillae did not significantly diverge from those reported in previous studies in relation to isolated teeth [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, research demonstrated hydrochloric acid as the most detrimental chemical to the dental samples while sulfuric acid enacted minimal alterations to the teeth, although some etching and discoloration were also noticeable (Cope and Dupras 2009). In addition, phosphoric acid resulted in variable changes of the organic and inorganic contents of teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%