2011
DOI: 10.2308/atax-10056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Increased Book-Tax Difference Tax Return Disclosures on Firm Valuation and Behavior

Abstract: We use event study techniques to gauge market participants' ex ante perceptions regarding the benefits and burdens of the Schedule M-3, and structural break analysis to investigate whether managers make ex ante or ex post changes in book-tax differences as a result of this mandatory change in federal tax return disclosures. We find evidence suggesting investors believe ex ante the substantial increase in book-tax difference disclosures will increase future tax burdens and/or tax-compliance costs. Investors als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing the BTD is important because BTD can be used as an attribute of financial reporting quality and can contain incremental informations for investors and users of companies' financial reports. Recent research focus on either BTD are associated with earnings management (Joos et al, 2000;Mills & Newberry, 2001;Donohoe & McGill, 2010;Comprix et al, 2011) or tax planning (Wilson, 2009). Some studies attribute the BTD to both EM and TM (Tang & Firth, 2011;Chen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the BTD is important because BTD can be used as an attribute of financial reporting quality and can contain incremental informations for investors and users of companies' financial reports. Recent research focus on either BTD are associated with earnings management (Joos et al, 2000;Mills & Newberry, 2001;Donohoe & McGill, 2010;Comprix et al, 2011) or tax planning (Wilson, 2009). Some studies attribute the BTD to both EM and TM (Tang & Firth, 2011;Chen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of each system leads to a gap between the pre-tax income and the taxable income (book-tax differences). This difference is used as a proxy for earnings management (Joos et al, 2000;Mills & Newberry, 2001;Donohoe & McGill, 2010;Comprix et al, 2011, Hanlon, 2005Blaylock et al, 2012) or tax planning (Wilson, 2009). Some studies attribute the book-tax differences to both earnings and tax management (Tang & Firth, 2011;Tang & Firth, 2012;Chen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Frischmann et al (2008) examine the market reaction to various dates regarding the development and implementation of FIN 48 and find no significant initial market reaction. 4 Similarly, Donohoe and McGill (2011) document a significant negative market reaction to the development of Schedule M-3. Donohoe and McGill (2011, 37) further note that ''as regulators acquire new and/or update old sources of data in an effort to reduce the tax gap, it is important that we recognize the potential valuation effects of such enforcement efforts.''…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study not only examines the initial announcement, but also the release of the draft form and instructions for Schedule UTP, and the final form and instructions for Schedule UTP. As noted in Donohoe and McGill (2011), examining the market reaction to news released on multiple event dates is important before making inferences about the response of market participants. These dates are important in assessing the response of market participants because the original draft of Schedule UTP reaffirmed the controversial provisions of Schedule UTP despite many concerns raised by commenters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%