2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of increased constant incubation temperature and cumulative acute heat shock exposures on morphology and survival of Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A slight difference in body length emerged at the prehatch stage, wherein embryos from the heat‐shock regime were slightly (5%) longer. Another study on whitefish found similar results, where weekly 1 hr temperature spikes of varying magnitude (from 2°C to 5°C and from 2°C to 7°C) had no effect on incubation period, survival, or size at hatch relative to a constant 2°C regime (Lee et al, 2016). In future experiments, it may prove interesting to increase the frequency of heat shocks as body size of whitefish embryos in these experiments was affected by twice‐weekly heat shocks, but not by once‐weekly heat shocks of the same magnitude, suggesting, as others have (Kingsolver & Woods, 2016; Niehaus et al, 2012), that performance responds differently as the duration of exposures changes.…”
Section: What Have We Learned From Other Thermally Variable Regimes?mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A slight difference in body length emerged at the prehatch stage, wherein embryos from the heat‐shock regime were slightly (5%) longer. Another study on whitefish found similar results, where weekly 1 hr temperature spikes of varying magnitude (from 2°C to 5°C and from 2°C to 7°C) had no effect on incubation period, survival, or size at hatch relative to a constant 2°C regime (Lee et al, 2016). In future experiments, it may prove interesting to increase the frequency of heat shocks as body size of whitefish embryos in these experiments was affected by twice‐weekly heat shocks, but not by once‐weekly heat shocks of the same magnitude, suggesting, as others have (Kingsolver & Woods, 2016; Niehaus et al, 2012), that performance responds differently as the duration of exposures changes.…”
Section: What Have We Learned From Other Thermally Variable Regimes?mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The majority of natural mortality occurred within the first month of development. Once embryos reached the eyed stage, mortality remained minimal until close to hatch, which is typical in lake whitefish . A difference in hatch timing was observed in control dishes from chronic morpholine trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These slow development rates create the potential for prolonged exposure to environmental stressors and large accumulated doses. The impacts of thermal stress have been well studied in lake whitefish ; however, few studies have examined the effects of chemical exposure on development .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute temperature changes similar in magnitude and duration to those used in this study have been documented during in situ monitoring in winter near thermal discharge sites (Thome et al, 2016). Development rate in lake whitefish and other poikilotherms is influenced by both average temperature and temperature variability (Lee et al, 2016;Lim et al, 2017;Mueller et al, 2015). F I G U R E 5 Embryo morphometric measurements following incubation in the flume (set 2, 51 days: 11 January to 2 March 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%