2020
DOI: 10.26451/abc.07.01.05.2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Increasing Visitor and Noise Levels on Birds Within a Free-flight Aviary Examined Through Enclosure Use and Behavior

Abstract: Visitors in a zoo environment have the potential to impact the animals that they are viewing in a variety of ways. Recently, there have been suggestions that free-range enclosures, where visitors can walk directly through an animal's exhibit, may reduce the potential for negative visitor impacts. The aim of this study was to examine associations between visitor numbers and noise levels and enclosure use and the stress and critical behavior of 24 bird species housed in a free-flight, mixed species aviary. Using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in these resources and the enclosure suitability increases the chance of aggression, reduction in basic biological processes, increased competition, and a reduction in overall welfare standards [8]. The evaluation of enclosure suitability should consider where visitor effect may come from and their potential influence on the inhabitants, and not just the physical measurements of the enclosure; such considerations may improve welfare standards for amphibians [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduction in these resources and the enclosure suitability increases the chance of aggression, reduction in basic biological processes, increased competition, and a reduction in overall welfare standards [8]. The evaluation of enclosure suitability should consider where visitor effect may come from and their potential influence on the inhabitants, and not just the physical measurements of the enclosure; such considerations may improve welfare standards for amphibians [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other taxa have benefited from research into the type of stress caused by a response to visitor presence [43,51]. Visitors causing vibration, auditory levels, the physical presence of potential danger, a change in light levels, or sudden movements can cause stressors in animals; further research in these areas would help to determine the types of mitigation that can reduce stress and increase visibility.…”
Section: Potential Extraneous Influences On Amphibian Enclosure Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to potential differences in guest behavior between studies, the indoor penguin habitat at the Saint Louis Zoo was designed so the lowest land surfaces are at eye level with many adult guests, frequently giving the birds a higher vantage point that may further minimize the perception of visitors as threatening. Birds in a mixed-species aviary found primarily in trees, as opposed to those on the ground, did not retreat from visitor pathways with increases in crowd size (Blanchett et al, 2020). Height relative to visitors may impact other taxa as well, such as primates (Chamove et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We expected zoo status to significantly impact behavior and space use following observations in other species (Blanchett et al, 2020;Learmonth et al, 2018;Lockley & Leadbeater, 2005). Inactivity and social proximity were significantly higher when the zoo reopened with limited guest capacity.…”
Section: Zoo Statusmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among some felid species, the presence of visitors has also been linked to decreased activity levels, and increases in visitor density have been related to decreased time spent visible (Mallapur & Chellam, 2002;Sellinger & Ha, 2005;Suárez et al, 2017). Several species of birds and other mammals have also been found to display visitor avoidance behavior (Blanchett et al, 2020;Chiew et al, 2020;Stevens et al, 2013).…”
Section: __________________________________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%