2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0272263103000202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Inferring, Verifying, and Memorizing on the Retention of L2 Word Meanings

Abstract: This study investigated whether a word-learning method in which learners infer the meaning of unknown words from the context, subsequently verify the meaning with the aid of a word list, and finally memorize the meaning ("meaning-inferred method") leads to better retention than one in which the meaning of unknown words is given in the form of a translation so that learners can immediately start memorizing ("meaning-given method"). Additionally, the learning effect of the various stages of the meaning-inferred … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
35
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it can be claimed that on the immediate vocabulary test, task type did not lead to significant differences in the learners' performance, whereas timing did affect the learners' performance significantly. The results of this study lend further support to findings of other researchers who have corroborated the effectiveness of incidental vocabulary learning (Hulstijn, 1992;Stern, 1992;Wesche and Paribakht, 2000;Laufer and Hulstijn, 2001;Mondria, 2003). The present findings are specifically in line with those of Fukkink et al (2001) who conclude that incidental vocabulary learning as a byproduct of contextualized language learning tasks or activities accounts for a substantial proportion of vocabulary acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, it can be claimed that on the immediate vocabulary test, task type did not lead to significant differences in the learners' performance, whereas timing did affect the learners' performance significantly. The results of this study lend further support to findings of other researchers who have corroborated the effectiveness of incidental vocabulary learning (Hulstijn, 1992;Stern, 1992;Wesche and Paribakht, 2000;Laufer and Hulstijn, 2001;Mondria, 2003). The present findings are specifically in line with those of Fukkink et al (2001) who conclude that incidental vocabulary learning as a byproduct of contextualized language learning tasks or activities accounts for a substantial proportion of vocabulary acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Contextual word learning is an incremental process influenced by text, word, learner and situational factors (Paribakht & Wesche, 1999). Correctly inferring a word's meaning from context is not always synonymous with learning (Frantzen, 2003;Haastrup, 1991;Hulstijn, 2001;Mondria, 2003;Mondria & Wit-de Boer, 1991;Pressley, Levin & McDaniel, 1987). The effect of incorrect inferences on word learning has been researched to a lesser extent, but it is generally assumed that incorrect inferences would interfere with the encoding of correct word meanings and have a negative effect on learning.…”
Section: Inferring Word Meanings From Context In a Second Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) actively inferring meanings from context (meaningfocused elaboration) increases readers' engagement with novel words and the context (Hulstijn, Hollander & Greidanus, 1996;Laufer, 2005;Mondria & Wit-de Boer, 1991;Schmitt, 2008); (2) Fraser, 1999;Kelly, 1990;Mondria, 2003).…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They suggested that memorization could satisfy certain needs of language learners; in addition, learners were advised to avoid rote learning. Mondrian (2002) investigated whether a word-learning method in which learners infer the meaning of unknown words from context and then memorize the meaning leads to better retention than one in which the meaning of unknown words are given in the form of translation followed by memorizing. The results revealed that the use of the meaning-inferred method leads to a similar level of retention as the meaning-given method.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%