The Effects of Intergroup Competition and Assigned Group Goals on Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness

Mulvey, Paul W.; Ribbens, Barbara A.

doi:10.1177/104649649903000601

Cited by 52 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies of group goal-setting have consistently shown a positive relationship between goal difficulty and task performance, thus replicating one of the commonly observed goal effects at the individual level (e.g., Mitchell, & Silver, 1990;Mulvey & Ribbens, 1999).…”

Section: Implicit Theories Of Ability In Groupssupporting

confidence: 53%

Small group learning: Do group members' implicit theories of ability make a difference?

Beckmann¹,

Wood²,

Minbashian³

et al. 2012

Learning and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

. (2012) NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Learning and individual dierences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A denitive version was subsequently published in Learning and individual dierences, 22, 5, 2012, 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.06.007 Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

show abstract

Section: Implicit Theories Of Ability In Groupssupporting

confidence: 53%

Small group learning: Do group members' implicit theories of ability make a difference?

Beckmann¹,

Wood²,

Minbashian³

et al. 2012

Learning and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All of these factors can potentially increase the level of group ef®cacy in the group. With regard to group effectiveness, studies have generally demonstrated a positive impact of group goal-setting (Gowen, 1986;Matsui et al, 1987;Mesch et al, 1994;Mitchell and Silver, 1990;O'Leary-Kelly et al, 1994;Mulvey and Ribbens, 1999). For example, in a meta-analysis of ten group goal-setting studies, O' Leary-Kelly et al (1994) found that the effect size for group goals on group performance was large (d 0.92).…”

Section: Goal-setting Trainingmentioning

confidence: 96%

Me and us: differential relationships among goal‐setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level

Gibson

2001

J Organ Behavior

121

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryEf®cacy-effectiveness relationships were examined for individual nurses and nursing teams who were either trained or untrained in goal-setting. At the individual level, positive direct relationships were demonstrated between self-ef®cacy and effectiveness, between training and subsequent self-ef®cacy, and between training and effectiveness. Initial self-ef®cacy also moderated the training-effectiveness relationship. Nurses low in initial self-ef®cacy realized greater effectiveness gains from the training than did nurses high in initial self-ef®cacy. At the team level, group ef®cacy was related to effectiveness, and training was related to subsequent group ef®cacy, but training was not related to effectiveness, and there were no moderation effects for initial group ef®cacy. Collective cognition and behavioral plasticity are potential explanations for different effects at the individual and team level and avenues for theory development and future research.

show abstract

“…Stanne dkk. (1999) hasil meta-analisis menunjukkan bahwa persaingan antarkelompok dapat meningkatkan kinerja dalam lingkungan kerja (Erev, Bornstein, & Galili, 1993), kelompok produktivitas (Mulvey & Ribbens, 1999), dan kinerja akademik (Okebukola, 1985(Okebukola, , 1986 Sansone dan Harackiewicz, (1996) membedakan dua cara kompetisi yang dapat memengaruhi motivasi intrinsik. Pertama adalah konteks kompetitif dijelaskan pada awal suatu kegiatan, yang dapat memengaruhi bagaimana individu menyelasiakan tugas.…”

Section: Diskusiunclassified

Cooperative vs Competitive: Filosofi Keseimbangan “Yin-Yang” dalam Hubungan Interdependency

Dudija

2015

bpsi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Teori ini 1 dikembangkan oleh Morton Deutsch (1949a, 1949b, 1973, 1985) danjuga diuraikan oleh David W. Johnson (Johnson & Johnson, 1989). Cooperative–Competitive merupakan salah satu teori dalam psikologi sosial yang dikemukakanoleh Morton Deutch. Ilmuan evolusi sosial mengatakan bahwa altruisme manusia dan kerjasama adalah hasil dari sejarah spesies yang unik “konflik antar kelompok dan perang” (Alexander, 1987; Buss, 1999; Campbell, 1975; Tooby & Cosmides, 1988), dapat diartikan bahwa konflik antar kelompok telah membentuk psikologi dan perilaku manusia khususnya (Vugt, Gremer, & Janssen 2007). Penelitian psikologi sosial konsisten dengan ide ini. Dalam hal ini manusia spontan membuat perbandingan “kita vs mereka” kategorisasi dan cepat mengembangkan aspek emosional dalam kelompok bahkan ketika keanggotaan didasarkan pada kriteria yang sederhana, seperti flip koin (Brewer, 1979; Ostrom & Sedikides, 1992; Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Manusia juga mudah melakukan tindakan diskriminasi terhadap anggota dari luar kelompok (Fiske, 2002) dan terlibat dalam tindakanaltruistik untuk membela kelompok mereka (De Cremer & Van Vugt, 1999;Sherif , 1966).

show abstract

The Effects of Intergroup Competition and Assigned Group Goals on Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness

Cited by 52 publications

References 51 publications

Small group learning: Do group members' implicit theories of ability make a difference?

Small group learning: Do group members' implicit theories of ability make a difference?

Me and us: differential relationships among goal‐setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level

Cooperative vs Competitive: Filosofi Keseimbangan “Yin-Yang” dalam Hubungan Interdependency

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About