2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109790
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of introducing elasticity using different interpolation schemes to the grand potential phase field model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…assuming linear interpolation of stiffnesses C eff = C α φ α and linear interpolation of eigenstrains ε * = ε * α φ α . A discussion regarding this choice of interpolation coupled with chemcial driving forces can be found in [51,52].…”
Section: Multi-phase Field Allen-cahn Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…assuming linear interpolation of stiffnesses C eff = C α φ α and linear interpolation of eigenstrains ε * = ε * α φ α . A discussion regarding this choice of interpolation coupled with chemcial driving forces can be found in [51,52].…”
Section: Multi-phase Field Allen-cahn Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it can not find this kind of resource, it will move randomly in the neighborhood. In order to keep the artificial biology with higher fitness to the full, the artificial biology with higher fitness can obtain less energy during the procession of moving randomly 9 .…”
Section: The Artificial Biology Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decoupling allows for the interfacial length to be defined independently from the bulk and interfacial energy, thus resulting in lower computational costs than the approach developed by Wheeler, Boettinger, and McFadden (WBM model) [60]. The grand potential formulation is another approach that defines the interfacial thickness independently of the bulk and interfacial free energies [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. However, the grand potential model requires more restrictive assumptions and makes modeling the impact of lattice strain on hydrogen diffusion challenging [70], which is a critical mechanism in the behavior of hydrogen in zirconium alloys.…”
Section: Previous Work On Zirconium Hydride Morphology Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grand potential formulation is another approach that defines the interfacial thickness independently of the bulk and interfacial free energies [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. However, the grand potential model requires more restrictive assumptions and makes modeling the impact of lattice strain on hydrogen diffusion challenging [70], which is a critical mechanism in the behavior of hydrogen in zirconium alloys. Because of its lower computational costs and higher versatility, the KKS model was chosen to model the microstructure evolution of the α-Zr/δ-ZrH system.…”
Section: Previous Work On Zirconium Hydride Morphology Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%