1987
DOI: 10.1016/0079-6107(87)90012-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of ionizing radiation on structure and function of DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 206 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods which use alkaline lysis and denaturation of DNA to detect DNA single-strand breaks, reviewed by Ahnstrom (1988) and George and Cramp (1987), are usually unable to discern differences in radiosensitivity between different cells or cell cycle phases . This is illustrated with monolayer/ spheroid data for alkaline sucrose gradient sedimentation ( Figure 1F), alkaline elution ( Figure 1G), and alkaline DNA precipitation ( Figure 1H) .…”
Section: Alkali Unwinding Is Influenced By Cell/ Nuclear Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods which use alkaline lysis and denaturation of DNA to detect DNA single-strand breaks, reviewed by Ahnstrom (1988) and George and Cramp (1987), are usually unable to discern differences in radiosensitivity between different cells or cell cycle phases . This is illustrated with monolayer/ spheroid data for alkaline sucrose gradient sedimentation ( Figure 1F), alkaline elution ( Figure 1G), and alkaline DNA precipitation ( Figure 1H) .…”
Section: Alkali Unwinding Is Influenced By Cell/ Nuclear Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…results with the comet assay indicate that the elevated chromosomal damage observed in treated AT cells is not due to a difference in the initial level of SS or DS DNA damage or in the rate of rejoining of strand breaks. Previous reports on the repair capacity of AT cells using X-irradition as the DNAdamaging agent suggest that the AT defect is not in SS DNA breakage and rejoining [Fornace and Little, 1980;Hariharan etal., 1981;Fornaceetal., 1986;Cantonietal., 19891, orin the initial level of DS DNA breakage [Coquerelle and Weibezahn, 1981;Coquerelle et al, 1987;Radford and Hodgson, 1990;Hittelman, 1992a, 1992bl. However, there may be a difference in the way AT cells process DS DNA damage [Coquerelle and Weibezahn, 1981;Coquerelle et al, 1987;George and Cramp, 1987;Debenham et al, 1987;Mozdarani and Bryant, 1989;Radford and Hodgson, 1990;Blocher et al, 1991;Hittelman, 1992a, 1992bl. Our results indicate no difference in rejoining rate, or extent of rejoining. Since heavily damaged cells can be excluded from analysis, rejoining rates using the comet assay may be a more accurate indicator of repair.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the Stereoisomer Form of the Thymine GlycolPermanganate oxidation of thymine has been shown to yield only the two cis-isomers (4,28). The determination of the stereochemistry of the cis-thymine glycol produced by the oxidation of single stranded DNA was determined by HPLC and confirmed by NMR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These activities form the basis for using radiation in chemotherapy, and the research in this area has been frequently reviewed (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Since the mid-1950s there have been studies on the effects of ionizing radiation on the chemical integrity of DNA (4,5,7,9,14). Ionizing radiation can induce a number of types of damage to DNA including single and double strand breaks, oxidation of the purine and pyrimidine bases, and cross-linking of DNA with proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%