2019
DOI: 10.11149/jkaoh.2019.43.4.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of job characteristics and non-regular work on the toothbrushing habit and oral check-up in Korean worker: using data from the 7th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KAHANES, 2016)

Abstract: Objectives:The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of job characteristics and nonregular work on the toothbrushing habit and oral check-up in Korean worker. Methods: This study was approved for the use of raw data from the 7th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KAHANES, 2016). The raw data was analyzed by complex sampling analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was determined as P<0.05. Results: The non-regular workers had lower rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reaching to higher rates of favorable level of oral health behaviors among working age population is not a dream since findings of some studies from foreign countries show promising results in this regards. For example, toothbrushing on at least 2/day basis has been reported by more than 90% of a group of Korean workers [ 33 ] and around 80% of a representative sample of adult population from eight European countries [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaching to higher rates of favorable level of oral health behaviors among working age population is not a dream since findings of some studies from foreign countries show promising results in this regards. For example, toothbrushing on at least 2/day basis has been reported by more than 90% of a group of Korean workers [ 33 ] and around 80% of a representative sample of adult population from eight European countries [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%