1981
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0602328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Lighted Incubation on Eggs with Pigmented and Nonpigmented Yolk

Abstract: A study was undertaken to determine if light causes embryonic acceleration by working through the xanthophyll pigments in the egg yolk. Using the same type of incubating and lighting system described by other workers, eggs from White Leghorn hens fed diets with and without dietary xanthophyll were exposed to either dark or lighted incubation and allowed to hatch. Results of the study indicated that light does not accelerate embryonic growth through its effect on the xanthophyll pigments in the yolk, but it doe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the shorter incubation period of the GL group of eggs is related to the higher growth rates of their embryos. The observation that lighted incubation of chicken eggs reduced hatch time is consistent with other researchers (Siegel et al, 1969;Walter and Voitle, 1972;Coleman and McDaniel, 1975;Bowling et al, 1981) who have reported a reduction in hatch time from 5 h to 3 days due to lighted incubation.…”
Section: Disscusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results suggest that the shorter incubation period of the GL group of eggs is related to the higher growth rates of their embryos. The observation that lighted incubation of chicken eggs reduced hatch time is consistent with other researchers (Siegel et al, 1969;Walter and Voitle, 1972;Coleman and McDaniel, 1975;Bowling et al, 1981) who have reported a reduction in hatch time from 5 h to 3 days due to lighted incubation.…”
Section: Disscusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar improvement in hatchability were reported from lighted incubation of meat type strain eggs (Szymkiewick et al, 1985). However, these findings were not in agreement with Zakaria (1989) who reported no difference in hatchability of meat-type breeder eggs between FL and dark incubations, nor do they agree with those of Bowling et al (1981) who reported a reduction in hatchability of White Leghorn eggs due to lighted incubation. The hatch time of the GL and D treatments of 465 and 489 h of incubation, respectively, revealed that the GL incubated eggs hatched earlier by approximately 24 h (Figure 1).…”
Section: Disscusioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Archer (2017) found that the Red and White light treatments had a higher hatch of fertile eggs than those of both Green and Dark treatments, but he found that Green light did not improve hatchability in his study suggesting that the wavelength of light responsible for increased hatchability. On the other hand, this result disagreed with Bowling et al (1981) who reported a reduction in hatchability of White Leghorn eggs due to white lighted incubation. Moreover, Zakaria (1989) reported no improvement in hatchability of meattype breeder eggs incubated under white fluorescent light.…”
Section: Fertility and Hatchabilitycontrasting
confidence: 55%