2011
DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.5.2226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Lottery Prizes on Winners and Their Neighbors: Evidence from the Dutch Postcode Lottery

Abstract: Each week, the Dutch Postcode Lottery (PCL) randomly selects a postal code, and distributes cash and a new BMW to lottery participants in that code. We study the effects of these shocks on lottery winners and their neighbors. Consistent with the life-cycle hypothesis, the effects on winners' consumption are largely confined to cars and other durables. Consistent with the theory of in-kind transfers, the vast majority of BMW winners liquidate their BMWs. We do, however, detect substantial social effects of lott… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
191
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A well known study along this line is Neumark and Postlewaite (1998) who show that a woman's employment probability increases if the sister's husband's income is greater than the own husband's income. More recently, Kuhn et al (2011) show that living next to a winner in the Dutch Postcode Lottery increases the level of own car consumption. Even if an externality 6 leaves the marginal rate of substitution between conspicuous and non-conspicuous goods unchanged, other margins can be affected, for example, those related to residential choice.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well known study along this line is Neumark and Postlewaite (1998) who show that a woman's employment probability increases if the sister's husband's income is greater than the own husband's income. More recently, Kuhn et al (2011) show that living next to a winner in the Dutch Postcode Lottery increases the level of own car consumption. Even if an externality 6 leaves the marginal rate of substitution between conspicuous and non-conspicuous goods unchanged, other margins can be affected, for example, those related to residential choice.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of empirical literature provides evidence for the importance of relative concerns in consumption choices (Kuhn et al, 2011;De Giorgi et al, 2012;Lewbel et al, 2013). Models of relative concerns usually assume that utility depends both on own consumption and on how own consumption compares to the average consumption among all others in a consumer's reference group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Windfall gains are used in other contexts (e.g. Imbens et al (2001) and Kuhn et al (2011) use US and Dutch lottery data). The impact of windfalls on the quantity of labour supply is studied by Henley (2004).…”
Section: Wealth and Labour Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%