2016
DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2016.1174520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Low Self-Control and Desire-for-Control on White-Collar Offending: A Replication

Abstract: To further our understanding of the similarities and differences between streetlevel and white-collar offending, two personality traits were used to predict offending intentions. The independent and joint roles of low self-control and desire-for-control on intentions to engage in embezzlement, credit card fraud, and shoplifting were assessed. Findings suggested that while low self-control was predictive of intentions to offend, the impact of desire-for-control varied based on the respondent's level of self-con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As one anonymous reviewer noted, a nationally representative sample would be preferable to an availability sample of five universities. While we agree, we also note that convenience (and in this case, availability) sampling is commonly used in exploratory studies, and additionally with the examination of undergraduate criminal justice students (Craig and Piquero, 2016;Lambert et al, 2014;Mallicoat and Brown, 2008;Tontodonato, 2006;Weaver et al, 2018). It should also be noted that the racial/ethnic and gender distribution of our sample conforms closely to previous research utilizing both criminal justice majors and college students in general (Lambert et al, 2014;Krimmel and Tartaro, 1999;Mallicoat and Brown, 2008;Tontodonato, 2006).…”
Section: Notessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As one anonymous reviewer noted, a nationally representative sample would be preferable to an availability sample of five universities. While we agree, we also note that convenience (and in this case, availability) sampling is commonly used in exploratory studies, and additionally with the examination of undergraduate criminal justice students (Craig and Piquero, 2016;Lambert et al, 2014;Mallicoat and Brown, 2008;Tontodonato, 2006;Weaver et al, 2018). It should also be noted that the racial/ethnic and gender distribution of our sample conforms closely to previous research utilizing both criminal justice majors and college students in general (Lambert et al, 2014;Krimmel and Tartaro, 1999;Mallicoat and Brown, 2008;Tontodonato, 2006).…”
Section: Notessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Indeed, researchers who are aligned to the general theory of crime argue that an interaction processes between the opportunity and weak self-control is seen as the leading cause of crime. For example, Craig and Piquero (2016) analyse people’s intention to get involved in three types of crime, such as “embezzlement,” “credit card fraud,” and “shoplifting.” As predicted in their analysis, people appear to engage in three types of crime because they are simply weakened by a lack of self-control failure.…”
Section: Criminal Theories Mostly Adapted In Fraud Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perceived innocence at crime manifests itself by justification and neutralization. Identity, rationality, learning, justification, neutralization, and lack of self-control all contribute to making white-collar crime action a convenient behavior for offenders (Craig & Piquero, 2016Engdahl, 2015;Holtfreter, Beaver, Reisig, & Pratt, 2010;Sutherland, 1983;Sykes & Matza, 1957).…”
Section: White-collar Conveniencementioning
confidence: 99%